Conley
#3,342 for girls in 2025, 46 births · #2,516 for boys in 2025, 53 births
Given to boys 87.1% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1905 · 12 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,061since 1882
Conley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,342 | 46 | #2,516 | 53 |
| 2024 | #3,639 | 42 | #2,313 | 61 |
| 2023 | #4,191 | 34 | #2,113 | 69 |
| 2022 | #3,073 | 53 | #2,299 | 62 |
| 2021 | #3,883 | 38 | #2,439 | 55 |
| 2020 | #3,915 | 36 | #2,546 | 50 |
| 2019 | #3,665 | 41 | #2,310 | 59 |
| 2018 | #7,762 | 14 | #2,445 | 53 |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | #2,003 | 71 |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | #1,921 | 76 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #1,931 | 75 |
| 2014 | #6,987 | 17 | #2,000 | 71 |
| 2013 | #6,462 | 19 | #2,225 | 58 |
| 2012 | #8,208 | 14 | #1,959 | 72 |
| 2011 | #6,148 | 21 | #1,835 | 77 |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | #2,010 | 68 |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | #2,663 | 46 |
| 2008 | #11,599 | 9 | #2,946 | 40 |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | #3,025 | 38 |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 | #3,782 | 26 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #3,710 | 25 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #4,005 | 22 |
| 2003 | #12,408 | 7 | #2,922 | 33 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #2,943 | 31 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #3,617 | 23 |
| 2000 | — | #3,075 | 28 | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #2,722 | 31 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #3,486 | 21 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #3,064 | 24 |
| 1996 | — | #3,678 | 18 | |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | #2,762 | 26 |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #3,109 | 22 |
| 1993 | — | #3,246 | 20 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,338 | 19 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #3,325 | 18 |
| 1990 | — | #3,779 | 15 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,809 | 14 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,203 | 16 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,731 | 12 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,510 | 21 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,333 | 9 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,270 | 13 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,676 | 17 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,680 | 17 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,838 | 10 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,168 | 13 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,215 | 12 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,164 | 8 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,113 | 22 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,540 | 16 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,946 | 12 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,696 | 27 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,966 | 21 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,366 | 16 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,889 | 22 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,914 | 19 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,428 | 30 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,609 | 23 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,891 | 17 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,625 | 23 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,975 | 17 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #1,354 | 33 |
| 1962 | — | #1,805 | 20 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,997 | 17 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,812 | 20 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,709 | 22 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,370 | 32 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,487 | 28 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,642 | 23 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,370 | 31 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,242 | 36 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,214 | 38 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,406 | 29 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,150 | 39 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,203 | 36 | |
| 1949 | — | #967 | 51 | |
| 1948 | — | #972 | 51 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,159 | 39 | |
| 1946 | — | #911 | 53 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,056 | 37 | |
| 1944 | — | #870 | 53 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,053 | 41 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,054 | 41 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,066 | 37 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,156 | 33 | |
| 1939 | — | #857 | 51 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,062 | 37 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,265 | 28 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,118 | 34 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,098 | 35 | |
| 1934 | — | #888 | 50 | |
| 1933 | — | #961 | 43 | |
| 1932 | — | #980 | 45 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,031 | 42 | |
| 1930 | — | #990 | 47 | |
| 1929 | — | #975 | 48 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,147 | 38 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,022 | 47 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,092 | 42 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,040 | 44 | |
| 1924 | — | #944 | 55 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,157 | 38 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,084 | 42 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,140 | 39 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,208 | 36 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,159 | 36 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,094 | 39 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,078 | 38 | |
| 1916 | — | #952 | 45 | |
| 1915 | — | #941 | 44 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,054 | 29 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,205 | 18 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,223 | 15 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,190 | 9 | |
| 1910 | — | #928 | 12 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #1,373 | 5 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,094 | 7 | |
| 1906 | — | #1,004 | 7 | |
| 1905 | — | #699 | 12 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,205 | 5 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #1,013 | 6 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | #1,079 | 5 | |
| 1894 | — | #954 | 6 | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #861 | 7 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #845 | 6 | |
| 1885 | — | #936 | 5 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Conley! It came in at #943, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1885, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Conley
- 203 spots since 2024 (#2,313 → #2,516)
- 30 spots since 2020 (#2,546 → #2,516)
- 585 spots since 2015 (#1,931 → #2,516)
- Biggest jump: 506 spots in 1905 (#1,205 → #699)
- Biggest drop: 305 spots in 1906 (#699 → #1,004)
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1905 at #699 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1908, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 1932–1934
- Highest: 1 in 11,026 boys born in 1905 were named Conley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 32,228 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 16.7% of all boys named Conley (680) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 16 | #845 (1886) | #908 |
| 1890s | 18 | #861 (1892) | #965 |
| 1900s | 58 | #699 (1905) | #1,038 |
| 1910s | 285 | #928 (1910) | #1,082 |
| 1920s | 429 | #944 (1924) | #1,081 |
| 1930s | 412 | #857 (1939) | #1,025 |
| 1940s | 436 | #870 (1944) | #1,026 |
| 1950s | 314 | #1,150 (1951) | #1,379 |
| 1960s | 219 | #1,354 (1963) | #1,741 |
| 1970s | 169 | #1,696 (1973) | #2,606 |
| 1980s | 149 | #2,426 (1982) | #3,248 |
| 1990s | 214 | #2,722 (1999) | #3,251 |
| 2000s | 312 | #2,663 (2009) | #3,269 |
| 2010s | 680 | #1,835 (2011) | #2,064 |
| 2020s | 350 | #2,113 (2023) | #2,371 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Conley in 2023
Top girls' names in 2023
Top boys' names in 2023
More about 2023
girls
1,604,582 girls got a published name in 2023; 1 in 47,194 of them was named Conley, which outranked 76.2% of the 17,615 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #4,114Yaneth35
- #4,114Zamaya35
- #4,114Zyanna35
- #4,191Conley34
- #4,191Alayia34
- #4,191Aliannah34
- #4,191Anapaula34
- #4,276Adelle33
- #4,276Amariyah33
- #4,276Ameliah33
Tied with 84 names at #4,191; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,710,576 boys got a published name in 2023; 1 in 24,791 of them was named Conley, which outranked 85.1% of the 14,215 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,097Raleigh70
- #2,097Yisrael70
- #2,097Zian70
- #2,113Conley69
- #2,113Elton69
- #2,113Emari69
- #2,113Hershy69
- #2,129Abbas68
- #2,129Buck68
- #2,129Buckley68
Tied with 15 names at #2,113; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.