Conley
#3,342 for girls in 2025, 46 births · #2,516 for boys in 2025, 53 births
Given to boys 87.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1905 · 12 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,061since 1882
Conley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,342 | 46 | #2,516 | 53 |
| 2024 | #3,639 | 42 | #2,313 | 61 |
| 2023 | #4,191 | 34 | #2,113 | 69 |
| 2022 | #3,073 | 53 | #2,299 | 62 |
| 2021 | #3,883 | 38 | #2,439 | 55 |
| 2020 | #3,915 | 36 | #2,546 | 50 |
| 2019 | #3,665 | 41 | #2,310 | 59 |
| 2018 | #7,762 | 14 | #2,445 | 53 |
| 2017 | #4,384 | 32 | #2,003 | 71 |
| 2016 | #4,990 | 27 | #1,921 | 76 |
| 2015 | #6,721 | 18 | #1,931 | 75 |
| 2014 | #6,987 | 17 | #2,000 | 71 |
| 2013 | #6,462 | 19 | #2,225 | 58 |
| 2012 | #8,208 | 14 | #1,959 | 72 |
| 2011 | #6,148 | 21 | #1,835 | 77 |
| 2010 | #9,231 | 12 | #2,010 | 68 |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | #2,663 | 46 |
| 2008 | #11,599 | 9 | #2,946 | 40 |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | #3,025 | 38 |
| 2006 | #12,420 | 8 | #3,782 | 26 |
| 2005 | #9,452 | 11 | #3,710 | 25 |
| 2004 | #10,690 | 9 | #4,005 | 22 |
| 2003 | #12,408 | 7 | #2,922 | 33 |
| 2002 | #10,246 | 9 | #2,943 | 31 |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #3,617 | 23 |
| 2000 | — | #3,075 | 28 | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | #2,722 | 31 |
| 1998 | #10,122 | 8 | #3,486 | 21 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #3,064 | 24 |
| 1996 | — | #3,678 | 18 | |
| 1995 | #8,079 | 10 | #2,762 | 26 |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #3,109 | 22 |
| 1993 | — | #3,246 | 20 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,338 | 19 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #3,325 | 18 |
| 1990 | — | #3,779 | 15 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,809 | 14 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,203 | 16 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,731 | 12 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,510 | 21 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,333 | 9 | |
| 1984 | — | #3,270 | 13 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,676 | 17 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,426 | 20 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,680 | 17 | |
| 1980 | — | #3,838 | 10 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,168 | 13 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,215 | 12 | |
| 1977 | — | #4,164 | 8 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,113 | 22 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,540 | 16 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,946 | 12 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,696 | 27 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,966 | 21 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,366 | 16 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,889 | 22 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,914 | 19 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,428 | 30 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,609 | 23 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,891 | 17 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,625 | 23 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,975 | 17 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #1,354 | 33 |
| 1962 | — | #1,805 | 20 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,997 | 17 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,812 | 20 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,709 | 22 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,370 | 32 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,487 | 28 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,642 | 23 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,370 | 31 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,242 | 36 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,214 | 38 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,406 | 29 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,150 | 39 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,203 | 36 | |
| 1949 | — | #967 | 51 | |
| 1948 | — | #972 | 51 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,159 | 39 | |
| 1946 | — | #911 | 53 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,056 | 37 | |
| 1944 | — | #870 | 53 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,053 | 41 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,054 | 41 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,066 | 37 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,156 | 33 | |
| 1939 | — | #857 | 51 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,062 | 37 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,265 | 28 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,118 | 34 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,098 | 35 | |
| 1934 | — | #888 | 50 | |
| 1933 | — | #961 | 43 | |
| 1932 | — | #980 | 45 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,031 | 42 | |
| 1930 | — | #990 | 47 | |
| 1929 | — | #975 | 48 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,147 | 38 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,022 | 47 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,092 | 42 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,040 | 44 | |
| 1924 | — | #944 | 55 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,157 | 38 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,084 | 42 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,140 | 39 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,208 | 36 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,159 | 36 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,094 | 39 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,078 | 38 | |
| 1916 | — | #952 | 45 | |
| 1915 | — | #941 | 44 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,054 | 29 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,205 | 18 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,223 | 15 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,190 | 9 | |
| 1910 | — | #928 | 12 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | #1,373 | 5 | |
| 1907 | — | #1,094 | 7 | |
| 1906 | — | #1,004 | 7 | |
| 1905 | — | #699 | 12 | |
| 1904 | — | #1,205 | 5 | |
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #1,013 | 6 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | #785 | 11 | |
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | #1,079 | 5 | |
| 1894 | — | #954 | 6 | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | #861 | 7 | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #845 | 6 | |
| 1885 | — | #936 | 5 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1882
The first year at least five boys were named Conley! It came in at #943, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1885, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Conley
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 203 spots since 2024 (#2,313 → #2,516)
- 30 spots since 2020 (#2,546 → #2,516)
- 585 spots since 2015 (#1,931 → #2,516)
- Biggest jump: 506 spots in 1905 (#1,205 → #699)
- Biggest drop: 305 spots in 1906 (#699 → #1,004)
Rise & fade · boys
23 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1905 at #699 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1908, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 21 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 1932–1934
Share of babies · boys
1 in 11,026
- Highest: 1 in 11,026 boys born in 1905 were named Conley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 32,228 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 16.7% of all boys named Conley (680) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 16 | #845 (1886) | #908 |
| 1890s | 18 | #861 (1892) | #965 |
| 1900s | 58 | #699 (1905) | #1,038 |
| 1910s | 285 | #928 (1910) | #1,082 |
| 1920s | 429 | #944 (1924) | #1,081 |
| 1930s | 412 | #857 (1939) | #1,025 |
| 1940s | 436 | #870 (1944) | #1,026 |
| 1950s | 314 | #1,150 (1951) | #1,379 |
| 1960s | 219 | #1,354 (1963) | #1,741 |
| 1970s | 169 | #1,696 (1973) | #2,606 |
| 1980s | 149 | #2,426 (1982) | #3,248 |
| 1990s | 214 | #2,722 (1999) | #3,251 |
| 2000s | 312 | #2,663 (2009) | #3,269 |
| 2010s | 680 | #1,835 (2011) | #2,064 |
| 2020s | 350 | #2,113 (2023) | #2,371 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Conley in 1900
boys
#785
11 births · 1 in 13,679 boys
Top boys' names in 1900
More about 1900
boys
150,474 boys got a published name in 1900; 1 in 13,679 of them was named Conley, which outranked 47.9% of the 1,506 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 34.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).