Clarence
Last seen for girls in 1992 at #13,317 · #1,499 for boys in 2025, 117 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1905 · 1,377 births
- Debut · boys
- 730 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 72 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 303,564since 1880
Clarence over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,499 | 117 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,551 | 113 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,558 | 112 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,366 | 137 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,419 | 129 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,325 | 135 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,152 | 169 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,119 | 173 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,182 | 158 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,208 | 156 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,070 | 185 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,028 | 197 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,065 | 176 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,023 | 191 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,010 | 191 | |
| 2010 | — | #989 | 199 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,014 | 193 | |
| 2008 | — | #932 | 218 | |
| 2007 | — | #845 | 251 | |
| 2006 | — | #816 | 249 | |
| 2005 | — | #694 | 297 | |
| 2004 | — | #744 | 250 | |
| 2003 | — | #715 | 260 | |
| 2002 | — | #693 | 262 | |
| 2001 | — | #627 | 302 | |
| 2000 | — | #613 | 310 | |
| 1999 | — | #598 | 317 | |
| 1998 | — | #565 | 349 | |
| 1997 | — | #546 | 362 | |
| 1996 | — | #527 | 376 | |
| 1995 | — | #499 | 425 | |
| 1994 | — | #455 | 482 | |
| 1993 | — | #441 | 499 | |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #429 | 518 |
| 1991 | — | #382 | 592 | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #375 | 618 |
| 1989 | — | #357 | 635 | |
| 1988 | #7,691 | 9 | #328 | 655 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #325 | 632 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #296 | 693 |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | #303 | 675 |
| 1984 | #6,810 | 9 | #284 | 732 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #260 | 795 |
| 1982 | #5,534 | 12 | #259 | 842 |
| 1981 | — | #257 | 846 | |
| 1980 | #6,789 | 9 | #257 | 859 |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | #241 | 911 |
| 1978 | #4,679 | 14 | #226 | 935 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #237 | 886 |
| 1976 | #3,812 | 17 | #219 | 953 |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 | #225 | 909 |
| 1974 | #4,459 | 13 | #213 | 1,005 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #200 | 1,100 |
| 1972 | #5,109 | 10 | #191 | 1,214 |
| 1971 | #3,652 | 17 | #187 | 1,370 |
| 1970 | #3,577 | 17 | #193 | 1,384 |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | #195 | 1,335 |
| 1968 | #3,169 | 17 | #184 | 1,382 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #182 | 1,376 |
| 1966 | #2,519 | 23 | #176 | 1,531 |
| 1965 | #3,402 | 14 | #166 | 1,802 |
| 1964 | #2,675 | 22 | #166 | 1,775 |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | #163 | 1,962 |
| 1962 | #2,741 | 20 | #163 | 1,950 |
| 1961 | #4,009 | 11 | #155 | 2,189 |
| 1960 | #2,989 | 17 | #157 | 2,198 |
| 1959 | #2,678 | 19 | #147 | 2,380 |
| 1958 | #2,663 | 19 | #138 | 2,525 |
| 1957 | #3,150 | 14 | #135 | 2,627 |
| 1956 | #2,725 | 18 | #120 | 2,953 |
| 1955 | #2,725 | 17 | #117 | 3,017 |
| 1954 | #2,695 | 17 | #108 | 3,182 |
| 1953 | #2,431 | 19 | #108 | 3,075 |
| 1952 | #2,581 | 17 | #102 | 3,157 |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 | #98 | 3,232 |
| 1950 | #2,436 | 17 | #95 | 3,340 |
| 1949 | #2,013 | 23 | #94 | 3,395 |
| 1948 | #2,416 | 17 | #87 | 3,790 |
| 1947 | #2,354 | 18 | #88 | 3,921 |
| 1946 | #2,024 | 21 | #89 | 3,567 |
| 1945 | #1,743 | 23 | #82 | 3,196 |
| 1944 | #1,808 | 22 | #74 | 3,575 |
| 1943 | #2,079 | 18 | #68 | 3,854 |
| 1942 | #2,046 | 18 | #67 | 3,741 |
| 1941 | #1,649 | 23 | #62 | 3,671 |
| 1940 | #1,682 | 22 | #64 | 3,487 |
| 1939 | #1,881 | 18 | #60 | 3,482 |
| 1938 | #1,475 | 26 | #58 | 3,639 |
| 1937 | #1,679 | 21 | #54 | 3,755 |
| 1936 | #1,741 | 19 | #52 | 3,772 |
| 1935 | #1,845 | 18 | #48 | 4,080 |
| 1934 | #1,440 | 26 | #45 | 4,213 |
| 1933 | #1,400 | 27 | #43 | 4,280 |
| 1932 | #1,192 | 36 | #40 | 4,895 |
| 1931 | #1,043 | 45 | #39 | 5,062 |
| 1930 | #1,084 | 46 | #39 | 5,498 |
| 1929 | #1,119 | 43 | #37 | 5,729 |
| 1928 | #1,085 | 48 | #35 | 6,068 |
| 1927 | #1,278 | 38 | #32 | 6,460 |
| 1926 | #1,262 | 38 | #29 | 6,537 |
| 1925 | #1,176 | 43 | #30 | 6,670 |
| 1924 | #1,170 | 45 | #29 | 6,895 |
| 1923 | #1,327 | 35 | #29 | 6,801 |
| 1922 | #1,309 | 36 | #29 | 6,861 |
| 1921 | #1,341 | 35 | #28 | 7,332 |
| 1920 | #1,132 | 44 | #26 | 7,221 |
| 1919 | #1,075 | 46 | #25 | 6,825 |
| 1918 | #1,184 | 40 | #23 | 7,187 |
| 1917 | #1,205 | 36 | #25 | 6,587 |
| 1916 | #1,408 | 27 | #24 | 6,304 |
| 1915 | #1,405 | 26 | #24 | 6,267 |
| 1914 | #1,098 | 30 | #22 | 4,909 |
| 1913 | #1,176 | 22 | #21 | 4,046 |
| 1912 | #1,421 | 15 | #21 | 3,590 |
| 1911 | #1,171 | 15 | #23 | 1,775 |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | #20 | 1,706 |
| 1909 | — | #19 | 1,518 | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | #19 | 1,428 |
| 1907 | #1,206 | 11 | #18 | 1,389 |
| 1906 | #1,002 | 14 | #18 | 1,319 |
| 1905 | #1,420 | 8 | #17 | 1,377 |
| 1904 | #1,251 | 9 | #17 | 1,310 |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 | #17 | 1,261 |
| 1902 | — | #17 | 1,292 | |
| 1901 | #961 | 12 | #17 | 1,196 |
| 1900 | #1,171 | 11 | #18 | 1,483 |
| 1899 | #1,099 | 9 | #17 | 1,139 |
| 1898 | #1,502 | 6 | #17 | 1,326 |
| 1897 | — | #17 | 1,201 | |
| 1896 | — | #17 | 1,254 | |
| 1895 | #858 | 14 | #17 | 1,326 |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | #17 | 1,185 |
| 1893 | #1,277 | 6 | #17 | 1,169 |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 | #17 | 1,276 |
| 1891 | — | #17 | 1,007 | |
| 1890 | — | #17 | 1,018 | |
| 1889 | — | #17 | 984 | |
| 1888 | — | #17 | 1,022 | |
| 1887 | #1,147 | 5 | #17 | 892 |
| 1886 | — | #17 | 995 | |
| 1885 | — | #17 | 906 | |
| 1884 | #1,024 | 5 | #18 | 889 |
| 1883 | — | #18 | 837 | |
| 1882 | — | #20 | 837 | |
| 1881 | — | #20 | 668 | |
| 1880 | #679 | 7 | #21 | 730 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Clarence was already there! It came in at #21, and was given to 730 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2020–2025, when fewer than 140 boys a year got the name.
See more about Clarence
- 52 spots since 2024 (#1,551 → #1,499)
- 174 spots since 2020 (#1,325 → #1,499)
- 429 spots since 2015 (#1,070 → #1,499)
- Biggest jump: 50 spots in 2005 (#744 → #694)
- Biggest drop: 122 spots in 2006 (#694 → #816)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1905 at #17 (1,377 births)
- Births halved by 1985, 80 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 72 yrs · run 1880–1951
- Top 1,000: 130 yrs · run 1880–2008
- Highest: 1 in 89 boys born in 1895 were named Clarence (1.1%)
- Latest: 1 in 14,599 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #17 in 1905, was only 1 in 96 (1.0%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 21.9% of all boys named Clarence (66,574) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 8,760 | #17 (1888) | #18 |
| 1890s | 11,901 | #17 (1895) | #17 |
| 1900s | 13,573 | #17 (1905) | #18 |
| 1910s | 49,196 | #20 (1910) | #23 |
| 1920s | 66,574 | #26 (1920) | #30 |
| 1930s | 42,676 | #39 (1930) | #48 |
| 1940s | 36,197 | #62 (1941) | #78 |
| 1950s | 29,488 | #95 (1950) | #117 |
| 1960s | 17,500 | #155 (1961) | #171 |
| 1970s | 10,667 | #187 (1971) | #213 |
| 1980s | 7,364 | #257 (1980) | #293 |
| 1990s | 4,538 | #375 (1990) | #482 |
| 2000s | 2,592 | #613 (2000) | #769 |
| 2010s | 1,795 | #989 (2010) | #1,085 |
| 2020s | 743 | #1,325 (2020) | #1,453 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Clarence in 1965
Top girls' names in 1965
Top boys' names in 1965
More about 1965
girls
1,765,164 girls got a published name in 1965; 1 in 126,083 of them was named Clarence, which outranked 54.9% of the 7,535 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,264Wednesday15
- #3,264Zora15
- #3,264Zulema15
- #3,402Clarence14
- #3,402Adelle14
- #3,402Altagracia14
- #3,402Analisa14
- #3,549Alicea13
- #3,549Alishia13
- #3,549Allie13
Tied with 146 names at #3,402; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,860,143 boys got a published name in 1965; 1 in 1,032 of them was named Clarence, which outranked 96.2% of the 4,425 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.