Cinda
Last seen for girls in 2011 at #14,824
- Peak · girls
- 1953 · 218 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,590since 1880
Cinda over time
Rank among girls' names. Cinda has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | — | |
| 2023 | — | |
| 2022 | — | |
| 2021 | — | |
| 2020 | — | |
| 2019 | — | |
| 2018 | — | |
| 2017 | — | |
| 2016 | — | |
| 2015 | — | |
| 2014 | — | |
| 2013 | — | |
| 2012 | — | |
| 2011 | #14,824 | 6 |
| 2010 | — | |
| 2009 | — | |
| 2008 | — | |
| 2007 | — | |
| 2006 | — | |
| 2005 | — | |
| 2004 | — | |
| 2003 | — | |
| 2002 | — | |
| 2001 | — | |
| 2000 | — | |
| 1999 | — | |
| 1998 | — | |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 |
| 1996 | — | |
| 1995 | — | |
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 |
| 1991 | #7,987 | 10 |
| 1990 | #10,193 | 7 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 |
| 1987 | #7,353 | 9 |
| 1986 | #4,964 | 15 |
| 1985 | #4,455 | 17 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 |
| 1982 | #3,780 | 21 |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 |
| 1979 | #4,052 | 18 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 |
| 1977 | #3,267 | 23 |
| 1976 | #2,387 | 34 |
| 1975 | #2,881 | 25 |
| 1974 | #2,616 | 28 |
| 1973 | #1,732 | 51 |
| 1972 | #1,786 | 48 |
| 1971 | #1,772 | 50 |
| 1970 | #1,719 | 53 |
| 1969 | #1,325 | 73 |
| 1968 | #1,406 | 64 |
| 1967 | #1,269 | 72 |
| 1966 | #944 | 116 |
| 1965 | #1,366 | 65 |
| 1964 | #1,334 | 71 |
| 1963 | #1,150 | 90 |
| 1962 | #1,014 | 112 |
| 1961 | #1,095 | 100 |
| 1960 | #943 | 128 |
| 1959 | #843 | 146 |
| 1958 | #755 | 173 |
| 1957 | #721 | 192 |
| 1956 | #650 | 216 |
| 1955 | #677 | 191 |
| 1954 | #639 | 205 |
| 1953 | #599 | 218 |
| 1952 | #652 | 187 |
| 1951 | #678 | 168 |
| 1950 | #625 | 183 |
| 1949 | #660 | 161 |
| 1948 | #705 | 141 |
| 1947 | #648 | 165 |
| 1946 | #857 | 93 |
| 1945 | #897 | 71 |
| 1944 | #1,046 | 56 |
| 1943 | #1,103 | 53 |
| 1942 | #1,137 | 48 |
| 1941 | #1,206 | 39 |
| 1940 | #1,591 | 24 |
| 1939 | #2,417 | 12 |
| 1938 | #1,316 | 31 |
| 1937 | #2,448 | 12 |
| 1936 | #2,521 | 11 |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 |
| 1934 | #3,449 | 7 |
| 1933 | #3,406 | 7 |
| 1932 | #3,274 | 8 |
| 1931 | #2,750 | 10 |
| 1930 | #2,690 | 11 |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 |
| 1923 | #3,641 | 8 |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 |
| 1921 | #2,941 | 11 |
| 1920 | #2,899 | 11 |
| 1919 | #2,063 | 17 |
| 1918 | #3,869 | 7 |
| 1917 | #3,344 | 8 |
| 1916 | #2,658 | 11 |
| 1915 | #3,434 | 7 |
| 1914 | #2,009 | 12 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 |
| 1912 | #1,981 | 9 |
| 1911 | #1,300 | 13 |
| 1910 | #1,521 | 10 |
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 |
| 1908 | #1,203 | 12 |
| 1907 | #1,384 | 9 |
| 1906 | #1,154 | 11 |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,431 | 8 |
| 1899 | #1,394 | 6 |
| 1898 | #1,098 | 10 |
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 |
| 1896 | #1,122 | 9 |
| 1895 | #1,299 | 7 |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 |
| 1893 | #1,091 | 8 |
| 1892 | #958 | 10 |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | #950 | 8 |
| 1888 | #959 | 8 |
| 1887 | #1,036 | 6 |
| 1886 | #778 | 9 |
| 1885 | #921 | 6 |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | #738 | 6 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Cinda was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1884, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Cinda is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Indiana#553 · 1 in 6,915
- Michigan#612 · 1 in 9,120
- Ohio#731 · 1 in 12,308
- Illinois#759 · 1 in 11,430
- Texas#1,180 · 1 in 18,426
Best ever in a state: #204 in Indiana, 1952.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | #553 | 7 | 1 in 6,915 |
| Michigan | #612 | 9 | 1 in 9,120 |
| Ohio | #731 | 8 | 1 in 12,308 |
| Illinois | #759 | 9 | 1 in 11,430 |
| Texas | #1,180 | 6 | 1 in 18,426 |
| California | #1,308 | 7 | 1 in 24,783 |
| New York | #1,339 | 5 | 1 in 32,675 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Cinda
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2011
- Biggest jump: 422 spots in 1966 (#1,366 → #944)
- Biggest drop: 325 spots in 1967 (#944 → #1,269)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1953 at #599 (218 births)
- Births halved by 1961, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 23 yrs · run 1945–1960
- Highest: 1 in 8,630 girls born in 1953 were named Cinda (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 293,178 girls born in 2011 (0.00%)
- 40.9% of all girls named Cinda (1,879) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 43 | #738 (1880) | #897 |
| 1890s | 62 | #958 (1892) | #1,219 |
| 1900s | 58 | #1,154 (1906) | #1,488 |
| 1910s | 102 | #1,300 (1911) | #2,451 |
| 1920s | 59 | #2,899 (1920) | #3,629 |
| 1930s | 117 | #1,316 (1938) | #2,743 |
| 1940s | 851 | #648 (1947) | #985 |
| 1950s | 1,879 | #599 (1953) | #684 |
| 1960s | 891 | #943 (1960) | #1,185 |
| 1970s | 343 | #1,719 (1970) | #2,714 |
| 1980s | 132 | #3,780 (1982) | #5,807 |
| 1990s | 47 | #7,498 (1993) | #10,071 |
| 2000s | 0 | — | — |
| 2010s | 6 | #14,824 (2011) | #14,824 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Cinda in 1962
Top girls' names in 1962
More about 1962
girls
1,966,603 girls got a published name in 1962; 1 in 17,559 of them was named Cinda, which outranked 86.6% of the 7,584 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,008Miranda113
- #1,008Neva113
- #1,008Penney113
- #1,014Cinda112
- #1,014Charleen112
- #1,014Elissa112
- #1,014Hillary112
- #1,020Anastasia111
- #1,020Denita111
- #1,020Tari111
Tied with 5 names at #1,014; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.