Chloe

#23 for girls in 2025, 6,203 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
2009 · 11,922 births
Debut · girls
20 births
In top 100 · girls
28 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
254,389
since 1880

Chloe over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201984peak #9, 2009girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#236,203#9,7147
2024#206,406—
2023#265,997—
2022#196,482—
2021#256,347#9,7147
2020#256,153#10,6056
2019#246,414#8,8898
2018#256,679#9,6707
2017#226,982#8,8408
2016#207,484#6,34913
2015#177,950#7,49110
2014#188,562#10,7176
2013#148,801#5,65915
2012#119,672#5,72015
2011#1011,007#6,57812
2010#911,765#6,35913
2009#911,922#6,09514
2008#1011,836#5,76715
2007#1610,759#5,43416
2006#1810,404#5,30316
2005#199,598#5,57814
2004#238,729#1,83467
2003#249,082#6,25811
2002#258,902#4,50217
2001#308,177#5,39013
2000#387,094#5,92011
1999#634,964#7,1398
1998#873,794#8,4796
1997#1093,015—
1996#1122,782#7,9716
1995#1362,332—
1994#1552,079—
1993#1581,957—
1992#1611,893—
1991#1791,671—
1990#2121,371—
1989#302864#4,52711
1988#479475—
1987#439506—
1986#461466—
1985#562351—
1984#587309—
1983#842182—
1982#850183—
1981#1,079130—
1980#1,030139—
1979#1,270100—
1978#1,096119—
1977#1,27593—
1976#1,28685—
1975#1,52766—
1974#1,73352—
1973#1,83246—
1972#2,39830—
1971#2,54229—
1970#2,77925—
1969#2,51527—
1968#2,63023—
1967#2,86819—
1966#3,26615—
1965#3,26415—
1964#2,67522—
1963#2,70421—
1962#2,46324—
1961#3,06017—
1960#2,64921—
1959#1,79438—
1958#2,86217—
1957#2,65119—
1956#2,24924—
1955#2,15625—
1954#1,90930—
1953#1,50342—
1952#1,97826—
1951#1,52838—
1950#1,52437—
1949#1,69731—
1948#1,49938—
1947#1,30249—
1946#1,12157—
1945#1,37434—
1944#1,14047—
1943#95268—
1942#96066—
1941#81578—
1940#82075—
1939#86266—
1938#77581—
1937#74683—
1936#70091—
1935#80571—
1934#75678—
1933#76973—
1932#74881—
1931#88760—
1930#71794—
1929#81475—
1928#92464—
1927#91167—
1926#93164—
1925#94462—
1924#84978—
1923#86472—
1922#85274—
1921#76192—
1920#72998—
1919#81275—
1918#72399—
1917#665104—
1916#596127—
1915#599119—
1914#70168—
1913#61870—
1912#58269—
1911#49669—
1910#58450—
1909#61440—
1908#57442—
1907#55443—
1906#47252—
1905#52842—
1904#45052—
1903#42556—
1902#48542—
1901#49937—
1900#39072—
1899#39054—
1898#38565—
1897#41450—
1896#38753—
1895#33473—
1894#34067—
1893#31176—
1892#31176—
1891#35948—
1890#32660—
1889#30164—
1888#30362—
1887#33241—
1886#36534—
1885#34134—
1884#32636—
1883#43519—
1882#30633—
1881#44714—
1880#36720—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Chloe was already there! It came in at #367, and was given to 20 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 21 girls a year got the name.

Where Chloe is popular in 1984

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNHWashington: #432 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,984 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMNIllinois: #672 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 6,051 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedWIMichigan: #401 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 3,315 girlsMINew York: #619 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 4,970 girlsNYMassachusetts: #497 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,785 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedRIOregon: #375 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,609 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedINOhio: #793 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 9,882 girlsOHPennsylvania: #678 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 7,561 girlsPANew Jersey: #486 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,913 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #494 for girls · 57 births · 1 in 3,379 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNEMissouri: #464 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,920 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedWVVirginia: #517 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,481 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedDEArizona: #589 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,221 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #605 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,682 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #166 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 710 girlsDCOklahoma: #466 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,445 girlsOKLouisiana: #589 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,393 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Chloe, so not publishedALGeorgia: #397 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,746 girlsGAHawaii: #228 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 878 girlsHITexas: #586 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 4,497 girlsTXFlorida: #1,151 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 12,334 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. District of Columbia#166 · 1 in 710
  2. Hawaii#228 · 1 in 878
  3. Oregon#375 · 1 in 2,609
  4. Georgia#397 · 1 in 2,746
  5. Michigan#401 · 1 in 3,315

Best ever in a state: #1 in Hawaii, 2008.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
District of Columbia#16681 in 710
Hawaii#22861 in 878
Oregon#37561 in 2,609
Georgia#397131 in 2,746
Michigan#401171 in 3,315
Washington#43291 in 2,984
Missouri#46481 in 3,920
Oklahoma#46661 in 3,445
New Jersey#486101 in 3,913
California#494571 in 3,379
Massachusetts#49771 in 4,785
Virginia#51771 in 4,481
Texas#586291 in 4,497
Arizona#58951 in 4,221
Louisiana#58971 in 4,393
North Carolina#60561 in 5,682
New York#619211 in 4,970
Illinois#672121 in 6,051
Pennsylvania#67891 in 7,561
Ohio#79371 in 9,882
Florida#1,15151 in 12,334
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Chloe
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 3 spots since 2024 (#20 → #23)
  • 2 spots since 2020 (#25 → #23)
  • 6 spots since 2015 (#17 → #23)
  • Biggest jump: 255 spots in 1984 (#842 → #587)
  • Biggest drop: 188 spots in 1944 (#952 → #1,140)
Rise & fade · girls
129 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2009 at #9 (11,922 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 4 yrs
  • Top 10: 4 yrs · run 2008–2011
  • Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
  • Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1943
Share of babies · girls
1 in 151
  • Highest: 1 in 151 girls born in 2010 were named Chloe (0.66%)
  • Latest: 1 in 259 girls born in 2025 (0.39%)
  • Its best rank, #9 in 2009, was only 1 in 154 (0.65%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 37.9% of all girls named Chloe (96,503) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s357#301 (1889)#352
1890s622#311 (1892)#356
1900s478#390 (1900)#499
1910s850#496 (1911)#638
1920s746#729 (1920)#858
1930s778#700 (1936)#777
1940s543#815 (1941)#1,168
1950s296#1,503 (1953)#2,015
1960s204#2,463 (1962)#2,809
1970s645#1,096 (1978)#1,774
1980s3,605#302 (1989)#663
1990s25,858#63 (1999)#137
2000s96,503#9 (2009)#21
2010s85,316#9 (2010)#17
2020s37,588#19 (2022)#23

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Chloe in 1984

girls
#587
309 births · 1 in 5,449 girls

Top girls' names in 1984

  1. #1Jennifer50,564
  2. #2Jessica45,857
  3. #3Ashley38,773
  4. #4Amanda33,915
  5. #5Sarah25,887
  6. #6Stephanie23,025
  7. #7Nicole22,270
  8. #8Melissa21,896
  9. #9Heather21,489
  10. #10Elizabeth20,360
  11. #587Chloe309
More about 1984

girls

1,683,817 girls got a published name in 1984; 1 in 5,449 of them was named Chloe, which outranked 95.2% of the 12,181 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Chloe
  1. #584Kylie313
  2. #585Mariah311
  3. #585Myra311
  4. #587Chloe309
  5. #587Loretta309
  6. #589Janie306
  7. #589Kali306
  8. #591Deana305

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1983
Risers
  1. ↑ 8,259Santana#9,015 → #756
  2. ↑ 2,419Tasia#3,151 → #732
  3. ↑ 2,198Teela#3,065 → #867
  4. ↑ 1,074Grisel#1,858 → #784
  5. ↑ 894Kaylee#1,715 → #821
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,856Dwan#874 → #2,730
  2. ↓ 720Toccara#937 → #1,657
  3. ↓ 713Kaleena#547 → #1,260
  4. ↓ 303Karie#1,000 → #1,303
  5. ↓ 300Karyn#820 → #1,120

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1984 →