Chloe
#23 for girls in 2025, 6,203 births · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2009 · 11,922 births
- Debut · girls
- 20 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 28 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 254,389since 1880
Chloe over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #23 | 6,203 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #20 | 6,406 | — | |
| 2023 | #26 | 5,997 | — | |
| 2022 | #19 | 6,482 | — | |
| 2021 | #25 | 6,347 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | #25 | 6,153 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #24 | 6,414 | #8,889 | 8 |
| 2018 | #25 | 6,679 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #22 | 6,982 | #8,840 | 8 |
| 2016 | #20 | 7,484 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #17 | 7,950 | #7,491 | 10 |
| 2014 | #18 | 8,562 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #14 | 8,801 | #5,659 | 15 |
| 2012 | #11 | 9,672 | #5,720 | 15 |
| 2011 | #10 | 11,007 | #6,578 | 12 |
| 2010 | #9 | 11,765 | #6,359 | 13 |
| 2009 | #9 | 11,922 | #6,095 | 14 |
| 2008 | #10 | 11,836 | #5,767 | 15 |
| 2007 | #16 | 10,759 | #5,434 | 16 |
| 2006 | #18 | 10,404 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #19 | 9,598 | #5,578 | 14 |
| 2004 | #23 | 8,729 | #1,834 | 67 |
| 2003 | #24 | 9,082 | #6,258 | 11 |
| 2002 | #25 | 8,902 | #4,502 | 17 |
| 2001 | #30 | 8,177 | #5,390 | 13 |
| 2000 | #38 | 7,094 | #5,920 | 11 |
| 1999 | #63 | 4,964 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #87 | 3,794 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #109 | 3,015 | — | |
| 1996 | #112 | 2,782 | #7,971 | 6 |
| 1995 | #136 | 2,332 | — | |
| 1994 | #155 | 2,079 | — | |
| 1993 | #158 | 1,957 | — | |
| 1992 | #161 | 1,893 | — | |
| 1991 | #179 | 1,671 | — | |
| 1990 | #212 | 1,371 | — | |
| 1989 | #302 | 864 | #4,527 | 11 |
| 1988 | #479 | 475 | — | |
| 1987 | #439 | 506 | — | |
| 1986 | #461 | 466 | — | |
| 1985 | #562 | 351 | — | |
| 1984 | #587 | 309 | — | |
| 1983 | #842 | 182 | — | |
| 1982 | #850 | 183 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,079 | 130 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,030 | 139 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,270 | 100 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,096 | 119 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,275 | 93 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,286 | 85 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,527 | 66 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,733 | 52 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,832 | 46 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,398 | 30 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,542 | 29 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,779 | 25 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,515 | 27 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,630 | 23 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,868 | 19 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,266 | 15 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,264 | 15 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,675 | 22 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,463 | 24 | — | |
| 1961 | #3,060 | 17 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,794 | 38 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,862 | 17 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,651 | 19 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,249 | 24 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,156 | 25 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,909 | 30 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,503 | 42 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,978 | 26 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,528 | 38 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,524 | 37 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,697 | 31 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,499 | 38 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,302 | 49 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,121 | 57 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,374 | 34 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,140 | 47 | — | |
| 1943 | #952 | 68 | — | |
| 1942 | #960 | 66 | — | |
| 1941 | #815 | 78 | — | |
| 1940 | #820 | 75 | — | |
| 1939 | #862 | 66 | — | |
| 1938 | #775 | 81 | — | |
| 1937 | #746 | 83 | — | |
| 1936 | #700 | 91 | — | |
| 1935 | #805 | 71 | — | |
| 1934 | #756 | 78 | — | |
| 1933 | #769 | 73 | — | |
| 1932 | #748 | 81 | — | |
| 1931 | #887 | 60 | — | |
| 1930 | #717 | 94 | — | |
| 1929 | #814 | 75 | — | |
| 1928 | #924 | 64 | — | |
| 1927 | #911 | 67 | — | |
| 1926 | #931 | 64 | — | |
| 1925 | #944 | 62 | — | |
| 1924 | #849 | 78 | — | |
| 1923 | #864 | 72 | — | |
| 1922 | #852 | 74 | — | |
| 1921 | #761 | 92 | — | |
| 1920 | #729 | 98 | — | |
| 1919 | #812 | 75 | — | |
| 1918 | #723 | 99 | — | |
| 1917 | #665 | 104 | — | |
| 1916 | #596 | 127 | — | |
| 1915 | #599 | 119 | — | |
| 1914 | #701 | 68 | — | |
| 1913 | #618 | 70 | — | |
| 1912 | #582 | 69 | — | |
| 1911 | #496 | 69 | — | |
| 1910 | #584 | 50 | — | |
| 1909 | #614 | 40 | — | |
| 1908 | #574 | 42 | — | |
| 1907 | #554 | 43 | — | |
| 1906 | #472 | 52 | — | |
| 1905 | #528 | 42 | — | |
| 1904 | #450 | 52 | — | |
| 1903 | #425 | 56 | — | |
| 1902 | #485 | 42 | — | |
| 1901 | #499 | 37 | — | |
| 1900 | #390 | 72 | — | |
| 1899 | #390 | 54 | — | |
| 1898 | #385 | 65 | — | |
| 1897 | #414 | 50 | — | |
| 1896 | #387 | 53 | — | |
| 1895 | #334 | 73 | — | |
| 1894 | #340 | 67 | — | |
| 1893 | #311 | 76 | — | |
| 1892 | #311 | 76 | — | |
| 1891 | #359 | 48 | — | |
| 1890 | #326 | 60 | — | |
| 1889 | #301 | 64 | — | |
| 1888 | #303 | 62 | — | |
| 1887 | #332 | 41 | — | |
| 1886 | #365 | 34 | — | |
| 1885 | #341 | 34 | — | |
| 1884 | #326 | 36 | — | |
| 1883 | #435 | 19 | — | |
| 1882 | #306 | 33 | — | |
| 1881 | #447 | 14 | — | |
| 1880 | #367 | 20 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Chloe was already there! It came in at #367, and was given to 20 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1881, when fewer than 21 girls a year got the name.
See more about Chloe
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 3 spots since 2024 (#20 → #23)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#25 → #23)
- 6 spots since 2015 (#17 → #23)
- Biggest jump: 255 spots in 1984 (#842 → #587)
- Biggest drop: 188 spots in 1944 (#952 → #1,140)
Rise & fade · girls
129 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2009 at #9 (11,922 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 4 yrs
- Top 10: 4 yrs · run 2008–2011
- Top 100: 28 yrs · run 1998–2025
- Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1943
Share of babies · girls
1 in 151
- Highest: 1 in 151 girls born in 2010 were named Chloe (0.66%)
- Latest: 1 in 259 girls born in 2025 (0.39%)
- Its best rank, #9 in 2009, was only 1 in 154 (0.65%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 37.9% of all girls named Chloe (96,503) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 357 | #301 (1889) | #352 |
| 1890s | 622 | #311 (1892) | #356 |
| 1900s | 478 | #390 (1900) | #499 |
| 1910s | 850 | #496 (1911) | #638 |
| 1920s | 746 | #729 (1920) | #858 |
| 1930s | 778 | #700 (1936) | #777 |
| 1940s | 543 | #815 (1941) | #1,168 |
| 1950s | 296 | #1,503 (1953) | #2,015 |
| 1960s | 204 | #2,463 (1962) | #2,809 |
| 1970s | 645 | #1,096 (1978) | #1,774 |
| 1980s | 3,605 | #302 (1989) | #663 |
| 1990s | 25,858 | #63 (1999) | #137 |
| 2000s | 96,503 | #9 (2009) | #21 |
| 2010s | 85,316 | #9 (2010) | #17 |
| 2020s | 37,588 | #19 (2022) | #23 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Chloe in 1922
girls
#852
74 births · 1 in 16,230 girls
Top girls' names in 1922
More about 1922
girls
1,201,003 girls got a published name in 1922; 1 in 16,230 of them was named Chloe, which outranked 85.3% of the 5,789 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).