Charlene

#1,942 for girls in 2025, 99 births · Last seen for boys in 1990 at #8,117
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1949 · 3,541 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
1 yr
of 146 years
Total births · girls
133,729
since 1888

Charlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201931peak #100, 1949girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,94299—
2024#1,753115—
2023#1,934102—
2022#1,828111—
2021#1,780114—
2020#1,704119—
2019#1,833111—
2018#1,813112—
2017#1,465153—
2016#1,534147—
2015#1,532146—
2014#1,427159—
2013#1,761116—
2012#1,612134—
2011#1,612134—
2010#1,593136—
2009#1,584142—
2008#1,521153—
2007#1,332182—
2006#1,260190—
2005#1,262178—
2004#1,127202—
2003#1,267165—
2002#1,197170—
2001#1,212168—
2000#1,081191—
1999#990208—
1998#845252—
1997#702307—
1996#720291—
1995#686310—
1994#569406—
1993#558427—
1992#508473—
1991#460531—
1990#395659#8,1175
1989#361710—
1988#350707#5,7517
1987#304804—
1986#306785#3,88211
1985#277902—
1984#261936#5,5616
1983#244961—
1982#2381,060#6,3855
1981#2481,003—
1980#2401,070—
1979#258935—
1978#253936#5,0596
1977#2341,068#5,8455
1976#2251,081#4,4187
1975#2261,073—
1974#2371,070#5,2275
1973#2111,206#4,0547
1972#1951,462#4,4416
1971#1771,733#3,9637
1970#1671,983#3,8367
1969#1631,996#3,3148
1968#1661,948—
1967#1602,076#2,9858
1966#1592,187#2,62710
1965#1422,590#2,61710
1964#1442,807#2,20514
1963#1492,729#2,67310
1962#1582,563#2,50411
1961#1502,834#2,70610
1960#1482,894#2,31513
1959#1532,746#3,2907
1958#1383,067#3,9445
1957#1363,149#2,19014
1956#1323,275#2,62810
1955#1303,301#2,21913
1954#1263,241#3,8275
1953#1133,504#2,9058
1952#1063,546#2,37611
1951#1033,441#3,0667
1950#1033,448—
1949#1003,541#3,2986
1948#1053,487—
1947#1053,477—
1946#1073,037#2,14312
1945#1142,388#2,13111
1944#1092,433#2,30910
1943#1212,354#2,7328
1942#1172,319#3,5605
1941#1252,060#2,33310
1940#1451,686#3,1306
1939#1391,704#3,1136
1938#1431,673#3,5345
1937#1411,581#2,19711
1936#1451,482#2,4529
1935#1461,395#2,39610
1934#1511,344#2,5639
1933#1561,174#3,2686
1932#1701,123—
1931#1791,008—
1930#195987—
1929#200932—
1928#215854—
1927#221833—
1926#276581—
1925#274587—
1924#316449—
1923#329390—
1922#363332—
1921#378318—
1920#383294—
1919#429233—
1918#417248—
1917#452203—
1916#497169—
1915#555133—
1914#60189—
1913#59475—
1912#63261—
1911#68640—
1910#76831—
1909#76128—
1908#72329—
1907#87119—
1906#1,15411—
1905#1,05713—
1904#1,00113—
1903#1,5926—
1902#1,3208—
1901#1,4666—
1900#1,7236—
1899#1,3946—
1898#1,00912—
1897——
1896#1,1229—
1895#1,2997—
1894——
1893——
1892#1,2786—
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888#1,2765—
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1888

The first year at least five girls were named Charlene! It came in at #1,276, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1888–1891, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Charlene is popular in 1931

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedAKMaine: #87 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 354 girlsMEVermont: #117 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 515 girlsVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedNHWashington: #137 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 670 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #153 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 981 girlsMNIllinois: #105 for girls · 103 births · 1 in 512 girlsILWisconsin: #147 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,003 girlsWIMichigan: #143 for girls · 42 births · 1 in 917 girlsMINew York: #408 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,473 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedRIOregon: #108 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 460 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedNVWyoming: #89 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 298 girlsWYSouth Dakota: #187 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,099 girlsSDIowa: #108 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 495 girlsIAIndiana: #139 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 816 girlsINOhio: #148 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 874 girlsOHPennsylvania: #268 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 2,864 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #133 for girls · 57 births · 1 in 616 girlsCAUtah: #69 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 272 girlsUTColorado: #101 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 385 girlsCONebraska: #107 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 510 girlsNEMissouri: #144 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 674 girlsMOKentucky: #170 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 788 girlsKYWest Virginia: #250 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,715 girlsWVVirginia: #285 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,510 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedNMKansas: #81 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 360 girlsKSArkansas: #95 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 382 girlsARTennessee: #162 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 821 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #398 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,220 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #70 for girls · 70 births · 1 in 314 girlsOKLouisiana: #287 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,685 girlsLAMississippi: #131 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 529 girlsMSAlabama: #289 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,191 girlsALGeorgia: #373 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,698 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Charlene, so not publishedHITexas: #135 for girls · 95 births · 1 in 592 girlsTXFlorida: #312 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,346 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Utah#69 · 1 in 272
  2. Oklahoma#70 · 1 in 314
  3. Kansas#81 · 1 in 360
  4. Maine#87 · 1 in 354
  5. Wyoming#89 · 1 in 298

Best ever in a state: #14 in Hawaii, 1948.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#69161 in 272
Oklahoma#70701 in 314
Kansas#81391 in 360
Maine#87181 in 354
Wyoming#8951 in 298
Arkansas#95461 in 382
Colorado#101211 in 385
Illinois#1051031 in 512
Nebraska#107211 in 510
Iowa#108371 in 495
Oregon#108111 in 460
Vermont#11751 in 515
Mississippi#131381 in 529
California#133571 in 616
Texas#135951 in 592
Washington#137131 in 670
Indiana#139291 in 816
Michigan#143421 in 917
Missouri#144401 in 674
Wisconsin#147231 in 1,003
Ohio#148541 in 874
Minnesota#153201 in 981
Tennessee#162321 in 821
Kentucky#170331 in 788
South Dakota#18751 in 1,099
West Virginia#250101 in 1,715
Pennsylvania#268271 in 2,864
Virginia#28591 in 2,510
Louisiana#287121 in 1,685
Alabama#289131 in 2,191
Florida#31251 in 2,346
Georgia#37381 in 3,698
North Carolina#39881 in 4,220
New York#408141 in 6,473
Alaska———
Arizona———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Charlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 189 spots since 2024 (#1,753 → #1,942)
  • 238 spots since 2020 (#1,704 → #1,942)
  • 410 spots since 2015 (#1,532 → #1,942)
  • Biggest jump: 283 spots in 1907 (#1,154 → #871)
  • Biggest drop: 145 spots in 1999 (#845 → #990)
Rise & fade · girls
61 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1888
  • Peaked 1949 at #100 (3,541 births)
  • Births halved by 1971, 22 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 1 yr · 1949
  • Top 1,000: 93 yrs · run 1907–1999
Share of babies · girls
1 in 483
  • Highest: 1 in 483 girls born in 1949 were named Charlene (0.21%)
  • Latest: 1 in 16,235 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 24.5% of all girls named Charlene (32,718) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s5#1,276 (1888)#1,276
1890s40#1,009 (1898)#1,220
1900s139#723 (1908)#1,167
1910s1,282#417 (1918)#563
1920s5,570#200 (1929)#296
1930s13,471#139 (1939)#157
1940s26,782#100 (1949)#115
1950s32,718#103 (1950)#124
1960s24,624#142 (1965)#154
1970s12,547#167 (1970)#218
1980s8,938#238 (1982)#283
1990s3,864#395 (1990)#643
2000s1,741#1,081 (2000)#1,284
2010s1,348#1,427 (2014)#1,618
2020s660#1,704 (2020)#1,824

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Charlene in 1931

girls
#179
1,008 births · 1 in 1,056 girls

Top girls' names in 1931

  1. #1Mary60,299
  2. #2Betty36,105
  3. #3Dorothy26,524
  4. #4Barbara21,804
  5. #5Joan19,119
  6. #6Helen17,664
  7. #7Margaret17,332
  8. #8Patricia16,469
  9. #9Shirley14,405
  10. #10Doris13,629
  11. #179Charlene1,008
More about 1931

girls

1,064,728 girls got a published name in 1931; 1 in 1,056 of them was named Charlene, which outranked 96.4% of the 4,979 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Charlene
  1. #176Laverne1,042
  2. #177Bettie1,032
  3. #178Daisy1,009
  4. #179Charlene1,008
  5. #180Susan1,005
  6. #181Rosalie1,002
  7. #182Nina997
Biggest movers since 1930
Risers
  1. ↑ 857Joretta#1,320 → #463
  2. ↑ 519Joetta#1,460 → #941
  3. ↑ 483Sondra#1,031 → #548
  4. ↑ 465Celine#1,460 → #995
  5. ↑ 343Lynne#1,274 → #931
Fallers
  1. ↓ 377Margo#937 → #1,314
  2. ↓ 349Rachael#894 → #1,243
  3. ↓ 317Evelyne#926 → #1,243
  4. ↓ 287Vivien#971 → #1,258
  5. ↓ 283Ardeth#629 → #912

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1931 →