Cedrick
Last seen for girls in 1983 at #10,275 · #3,314 for boys in 2025, 35 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1978 · 200 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,342since 1951
Cedrick over time
Rank among boys' names. Cedrick has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #3,314 | 35 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,715 | 48 | |
| 2023 | — | #3,347 | 35 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,919 | 43 | |
| 2021 | — | #3,180 | 37 | |
| 2020 | — | #3,418 | 32 | |
| 2019 | — | #2,736 | 46 | |
| 2018 | — | #2,445 | 53 | |
| 2017 | — | #2,715 | 45 | |
| 2016 | — | #2,885 | 41 | |
| 2015 | — | #2,276 | 58 | |
| 2014 | — | #2,175 | 62 | |
| 2013 | — | #2,848 | 40 | |
| 2012 | — | #2,594 | 47 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,284 | 56 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,057 | 66 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,861 | 78 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,916 | 75 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,741 | 85 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,684 | 84 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,725 | 77 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,671 | 77 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,673 | 74 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,395 | 94 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,400 | 89 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,247 | 106 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,118 | 118 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,085 | 119 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,116 | 113 | |
| 1996 | — | #922 | 142 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,016 | 119 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,070 | 109 | |
| 1993 | — | #979 | 122 | |
| 1992 | — | #967 | 124 | |
| 1991 | — | #981 | 119 | |
| 1990 | — | #828 | 152 | |
| 1989 | — | #758 | 169 | |
| 1988 | — | #827 | 131 | |
| 1987 | — | #777 | 140 | |
| 1986 | — | #789 | 132 | |
| 1985 | — | #781 | 129 | |
| 1984 | — | #692 | 158 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #655 | 170 |
| 1982 | — | #642 | 180 | |
| 1981 | — | #647 | 173 | |
| 1980 | — | #622 | 197 | |
| 1979 | — | #701 | 149 | |
| 1978 | — | #594 | 200 | |
| 1977 | — | #692 | 150 | |
| 1976 | — | #658 | 155 | |
| 1975 | — | #703 | 139 | |
| 1974 | — | #654 | 152 | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #714 | 127 |
| 1972 | — | #740 | 114 | |
| 1971 | — | #816 | 98 | |
| 1970 | — | #845 | 91 | |
| 1969 | — | #861 | 79 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,183 | 41 | |
| 1967 | — | #885 | 66 | |
| 1966 | — | #984 | 55 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,233 | 38 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,350 | 34 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,121 | 47 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,387 | 32 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,349 | 35 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,523 | 28 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,865 | 19 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,677 | 22 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,634 | 24 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,015 | 16 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #3,452 | 6 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,905 | 8 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #2,662 | 9 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Cedrick! It came in at #2,662, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1952, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Cedrick
- 599 spots since 2024 (#2,715 → #3,314)
- 104 spots since 2020 (#3,418 → #3,314)
- 1,038 spots since 2015 (#2,276 → #3,314)
- Biggest jump: 322 spots in 1969 (#1,183 → #861)
- Biggest drop: 298 spots in 1968 (#885 → #1,183)
- Debuted 1951
- Peaked 1978 at #594 (200 births)
- Births halved by 2001, 23 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1969–1993
- Highest: 1 in 8,209 boys born in 1978 were named Cedrick (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 48,802 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 24.9% of all boys named Cedrick (1,579) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 113 | #1,634 (1957) | #2,372 |
| 1960s | 455 | #861 (1969) | #1,188 |
| 1970s | 1,375 | #594 (1978) | #712 |
| 1980s | 1,579 | #622 (1980) | #719 |
| 1990s | 1,237 | #828 (1990) | #1,008 |
| 2000s | 839 | #1,247 (2000) | #1,631 |
| 2010s | 514 | #2,057 (2010) | #2,502 |
| 2020s | 230 | #2,715 (2024) | #3,149 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Cedrick in 2010
Top boys' names in 2010
More about 2010
boys
1,918,676 boys got a published name in 2010; 1 in 29,071 of them was named Cedrick, which outranked 85.6% of the 14,270 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,037Taylen67
- #2,037Tyrus67
- #2,037Vito67
- #2,057Cedrick66
- #2,057Bryar66
- #2,057Davi66
- #2,057Haydn66
- #2,069Alekzander65
- #2,069Cadyn65
- #2,069Calder65
Tied with 11 names at #2,057; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.