Blakeley
#2,542 for girls in 2025, 69 births · Last seen for boys in 2015 at #10,644
Given to girls 93.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 96 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,351since 1977
Blakeley over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,542 | 69 | — | |
| 2024 | #2,033 | 96 | — | |
| 2023 | #2,555 | 69 | — | |
| 2022 | #3,073 | 53 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,892 | 58 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,682 | 62 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,376 | 75 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,084 | 92 | — | |
| 2017 | #3,014 | 54 | — | |
| 2016 | #2,798 | 61 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,471 | 73 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #3,272 | 49 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,726 | 63 | — | |
| 2012 | #2,426 | 76 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #5,207 | 26 | — | |
| 2010 | #6,182 | 21 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #6,091 | 22 | — | |
| 2008 | #8,965 | 13 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,092 | 18 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,142 | 17 | — | |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #7,391 | 15 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,998 | 13 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #10,102 | 9 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #6,073 | 16 | — | |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,574 | 11 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #5,677 | 16 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,826 | 20 | — | |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 | — | |
| 1991 | #5,399 | 17 | #5,521 | 9 |
| 1990 | #4,694 | 20 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | #5,545 | 15 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | #6,523 | 5 | |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | #4,215 | 9 |
| 1983 | — | #6,238 | 5 | |
| 1982 | — | #5,003 | 7 | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | #5,525 | 6 | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #5,772 | 5 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Blakeley! It came in at #8,444, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1979–1983, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Blakeley
- 509 spots since 2024 (#2,033 → #2,542)
- 140 spots since 2020 (#2,682 → #2,542)
- 71 spots since 2015 (#2,471 → #2,542)
- Debuted 1977
- Peaked 2024 at #2,033 (96 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 16,877 girls born in 2024 were named Blakeley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 23,294 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 43.7% of all girls named Blakeley (590) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1986, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12 | #8,444 (1977) | #8,503 |
| 1980s | 41 | #5,545 (1989) | #7,097 |
| 1990s | 153 | #4,694 (1990) | #6,280 |
| 2000s | 148 | #6,091 (2009) | #7,791 |
| 2010s | 590 | #2,084 (2018) | #3,256 |
| 2020s | 407 | #2,033 (2024) | #2,630 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Blakeley in 2012
Top girls' names in 2012
Top boys' names in 2012
More about 2012
girls
1,761,053 girls got a published name in 2012; 1 in 23,172 of them was named Blakeley, which outranked 87.6% of the 19,534 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,401Shanelle77
- #2,401Uma77
- #2,401Venus77
- #2,426Blakeley76
- #2,426Alasia76
- #2,426Angelia76
- #2,426Brighton76
- #2,449Aeris75
- #2,449Amethyst75
- #2,449Angeles75
Tied with 22 names at #2,426; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,896,946 boys got a published name in 2012; 1 in 316,158 of them was named Blakeley, which outranked 24.4% of the 14,250 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #9,709Zinn7
- #9,709Zlatan7
- #9,709Zylon7
- #10,770Blakeley6
- #10,770Aadhavan6
- #10,770Aadith6
- #10,770Aadiv6
- #12,274Aadrit5
- #12,274Aakarsh5
- #12,274Aalok5
Tied with 1,503 names at #10,770; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.