Beauford
Last seen for girls in 1921 at #5,099 · Last seen for boys in 2020 at #10,605
Given to boys 99.0% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1934 · 34 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,016since 1905
Beauford over time
Rank among boys' names. Beauford has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | #10,605 | 6 | |
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | #6,385 | 5 | |
| 1981 | — | #5,468 | 6 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #6,056 | 5 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #3,941 | 8 | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | #4,054 | 7 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | #3,935 | 6 | |
| 1968 | — | #4,136 | 5 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,249 | 7 | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #3,282 | 7 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,044 | 8 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,041 | 8 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,356 | 7 | |
| 1960 | — | #2,315 | 13 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,414 | 12 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,275 | 7 | |
| 1957 | — | #2,274 | 13 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | #3,176 | 7 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,073 | 14 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,904 | 16 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,019 | 14 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,702 | 19 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,218 | 12 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,356 | 11 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,759 | 17 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,242 | 10 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,080 | 12 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,910 | 15 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,042 | 13 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,083 | 12 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,397 | 23 | |
| 1939 | — | #1,879 | 14 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,476 | 21 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,344 | 25 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,639 | 17 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,656 | 18 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,133 | 34 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,456 | 22 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,324 | 27 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,489 | 22 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,821 | 17 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,413 | 26 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,382 | 28 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,959 | 17 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,432 | 26 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,390 | 28 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,263 | 33 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,300 | 31 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,282 | 32 | |
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | #1,329 | 31 |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 | #1,252 | 33 |
| 1919 | — | #1,264 | 31 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,648 | 21 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,396 | 25 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,240 | 29 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,878 | 15 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,772 | 13 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,676 | 11 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,353 | 13 | |
| 1911 | — | #1,740 | 5 | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | #1,233 | 5 | |
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Beauford! It came in at #1,233, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1905–1911, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Beauford
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2020
- Debuted 1905
- Peaked 1934 at #1,133 (34 births)
- Births halved by 1936, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 26,461 boys born in 1905 were named Beauford (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 287,679 boys born in 2020 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,133 in 1934, was only 1 in 30,370 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 28.1% of all boys named Beauford (285) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,233 (1905) | #1,233 |
| 1910s | 163 | #1,240 (1916) | #1,552 |
| 1920s | 285 | #1,252 (1920) | #1,400 |
| 1930s | 217 | #1,133 (1934) | #1,522 |
| 1940s | 144 | #1,397 (1940) | #1,979 |
| 1950s | 99 | #1,904 (1951) | #2,575 |
| 1960s | 66 | #2,315 (1960) | #3,369 |
| 1970s | 20 | #3,941 (1975) | #4,684 |
| 1980s | 11 | #5,468 (1981) | #5,927 |
| 1990s | 0 | — | — |
| 2000s | 0 | — | — |
| 2010s | 0 | — | — |
| 2020s | 6 | #10,605 (2020) | #10,605 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Beauford in 1922
Top boys' names in 1922
More about 1922
boys
1,088,154 boys got a published name in 1922; 1 in 34,005 of them was named Beauford, which outranked 74.2% of the 4,967 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,259Rolla33
- #1,259Roswell33
- #1,259Selmer33
- #1,282Beauford32
- #1,282Algie32
- #1,282Benard32
- #1,282Camille32
- #1,308Adrien31
- #1,308Alcide31
- #1,308Antoine31
Tied with 25 names at #1,282; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.