Audley
Last seen for girls in 1924 at #5,061 · Last seen for boys in 1998 at #8,479
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1894 · 12 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 694since 1891
Audley over time
Rank among boys' names. Audley has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | #8,479 | 6 | |
| 1997 | — | #6,618 | 8 | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | #8,800 | 5 | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | #8,236 | 5 | |
| 1990 | — | #8,117 | 5 | |
| 1989 | — | #5,165 | 9 | |
| 1988 | — | #5,200 | 8 | |
| 1987 | — | #5,459 | 7 | |
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | #5,785 | 6 | |
| 1984 | — | #4,973 | 7 | |
| 1983 | — | #5,484 | 6 | |
| 1982 | — | #5,619 | 6 | |
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #4,797 | 6 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #4,505 | 6 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | #3,521 | 8 | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | #3,930 | 5 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | #4,048 | 5 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,848 | 9 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,652 | 6 | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #2,818 | 9 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,993 | 5 | |
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,942 | 8 | |
| 1953 | — | #3,425 | 6 | |
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,329 | 6 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,337 | 11 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,326 | 11 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,370 | 6 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,813 | 16 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,242 | 10 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,633 | 8 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,405 | 10 | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,288 | 10 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,326 | 10 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,992 | 13 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,452 | 9 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,246 | 11 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,742 | 8 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,093 | 12 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,638 | 9 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,390 | 6 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,496 | 24 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,848 | 17 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,048 | 15 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,298 | 13 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,725 | 10 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,193 | 14 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #1,458 | 27 |
| 1923 | — | #1,874 | 18 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,883 | 18 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,632 | 11 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,820 | 19 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,063 | 15 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,260 | 13 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,693 | 19 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,459 | 23 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,968 | 14 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,496 | 6 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,269 | 6 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | #919 | 8 | |
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | #933 | 7 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | #594 | 12 | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | #963 | 5 | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Audley! It came in at #963, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1891–1893, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Audley
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1998
- Debuted 1891
- Peaked 1894 at #594 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1895, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 4 yrs · 1891–1905
- Highest: 1 in 9,647 boys born in 1894 were named Audley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 318,561 boys born in 1998 (0.00%)
- 23.3% of all boys named Audley (162) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 17 | #594 (1894) | #779 |
| 1900s | 15 | #919 (1905) | #926 |
| 1910s | 106 | #1,459 (1916) | #2,039 |
| 1920s | 162 | #1,458 (1924) | #2,078 |
| 1930s | 112 | #1,496 (1930) | #2,366 |
| 1940s | 82 | #1,813 (1946) | #2,677 |
| 1950s | 58 | #2,764 (1955) | #3,407 |
| 1960s | 30 | #2,848 (1962) | #3,685 |
| 1970s | 29 | #3,521 (1970) | #4,095 |
| 1980s | 54 | #4,973 (1984) | #5,551 |
| 1990s | 29 | #6,618 (1997) | #8,050 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Audley in 1924
Top girls' names in 1924
Top boys' names in 1924
More about 1924
girls
1,248,872 girls got a published name in 1924; 1 in 249,774 of them was named Audley, which outranked 14.2% of the 5,900 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 839 names at #5,061; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,132,742 boys got a published name in 1924; 1 in 41,953 of them was named Audley, which outranked 70.7% of the 4,970 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,414Wendall28
- #1,414West28
- #1,414Westley28
- #1,458Audley27
- #1,458Chalmers27
- #1,458Cicero27
- #1,458Clemon27
- #1,492Anselmo26
- #1,492Augustin26
- #1,492Carnell26
Tied with 33 names at #1,458; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.