Ashlyn
#972 for girls in 2025, 262 births · Last seen for boys in 2013 at #12,136
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 2,539 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 48,039since 1963
Ashlyn over time
Rank among girls' names. Ashlyn has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #972 | 262 | — | |
| 2024 | #901 | 294 | — | |
| 2023 | #832 | 330 | — | |
| 2022 | #775 | 367 | — | |
| 2021 | #713 | 402 | — | |
| 2020 | #601 | 483 | — | |
| 2019 | #588 | 520 | — | |
| 2018 | #569 | 543 | — | |
| 2017 | #470 | 662 | — | |
| 2016 | #398 | 836 | — | |
| 2015 | #332 | 984 | — | |
| 2014 | #308 | 1,063 | — | |
| 2013 | #258 | 1,240 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #207 | 1,514 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #172 | 1,834 | — | |
| 2010 | #157 | 1,947 | — | |
| 2009 | #146 | 2,194 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #152 | 2,264 | — | |
| 2007 | #155 | 2,262 | #10,921 | 6 |
| 2006 | #141 | 2,458 | — | |
| 2005 | #127 | 2,539 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #131 | 2,455 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #139 | 2,368 | #7,245 | 9 |
| 2002 | #158 | 2,077 | — | |
| 2001 | #157 | 2,031 | — | |
| 2000 | #178 | 1,822 | — | |
| 1999 | #191 | 1,638 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #201 | 1,548 | — | |
| 1997 | #217 | 1,367 | — | |
| 1996 | #227 | 1,243 | — | |
| 1995 | #233 | 1,214 | — | |
| 1994 | #256 | 1,093 | — | |
| 1993 | #309 | 857 | — | |
| 1992 | #371 | 688 | — | |
| 1991 | #477 | 511 | — | |
| 1990 | #560 | 419 | — | |
| 1989 | #572 | 385 | — | |
| 1988 | #683 | 281 | — | |
| 1987 | #798 | 219 | — | |
| 1986 | #929 | 171 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,071 | 137 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,303 | 95 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,411 | 83 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,532 | 37 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,723 | 33 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,215 | 26 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,236 | 25 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,388 | 22 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,761 | 19 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,812 | 17 | — | |
| 1975 | #5,161 | 11 | — | |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | — | |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,300 | 13 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,958 | 13 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,969 | 19 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,845 | 12 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,740 | 12 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,938 | 18 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | — | |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ashlyn! It came in at #5,296, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1963, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Ashlyn is popular in 2006
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Idaho#29 · 1 in 171
- South Dakota#43 · 1 in 167
- North Dakota#49 · 1 in 171
- Montana#57 · 1 in 214
- South Carolina#57 · 1 in 279
Best ever in a state: #26 in Wyoming, 2008.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #29 | 41 | 1 in 171 |
| South Dakota | #43 | 19 | 1 in 167 |
| North Dakota | #49 | 15 | 1 in 171 |
| Montana | #57 | 14 | 1 in 214 |
| South Carolina | #57 | 68 | 1 in 279 |
| Arkansas | #59 | 48 | 1 in 260 |
| Iowa | #59 | 52 | 1 in 271 |
| Utah | #61 | 63 | 1 in 299 |
| Oklahoma | #67 | 55 | 1 in 318 |
| Mississippi | #79 | 34 | 1 in 368 |
| Kansas | #82 | 39 | 1 in 354 |
| Indiana | #88 | 79 | 1 in 419 |
| Louisiana | #90 | 50 | 1 in 400 |
| Tennessee | #90 | 76 | 1 in 418 |
| Colorado | #91 | 61 | 1 in 415 |
| Wyoming | #93 | 6 | 1 in 222 |
| Alabama | #96 | 47 | 1 in 434 |
| Missouri | #97 | 67 | 1 in 443 |
| North Carolina | #97 | 100 | 1 in 471 |
| Alaska | #99 | 8 | 1 in 299 |
| Wisconsin | #103 | 54 | 1 in 466 |
| Nebraska | #125 | 18 | 1 in 468 |
| Georgia | #133 | 85 | 1 in 633 |
| Texas | #133 | 262 | 1 in 634 |
| Washington | #133 | 53 | 1 in 578 |
| Minnesota | #134 | 46 | 1 in 584 |
| Virginia | #138 | 63 | 1 in 601 |
| Ohio | #140 | 89 | 1 in 644 |
| New Hampshire | #149 | 8 | 1 in 563 |
| Arizona | #152 | 58 | 1 in 660 |
| Nevada | #156 | 22 | 1 in 569 |
| Florida | #157 | 120 | 1 in 743 |
| Kentucky | #158 | 30 | 1 in 677 |
| Michigan | #159 | 66 | 1 in 715 |
| Oregon | #166 | 25 | 1 in 660 |
| New Mexico | #170 | 14 | 1 in 602 |
| Hawaii | #172 | 7 | 1 in 516 |
| Illinois | #184 | 78 | 1 in 874 |
| Delaware | #191 | 5 | 1 in 628 |
| Maryland | #199 | 30 | 1 in 838 |
| Pennsylvania | #201 | 59 | 1 in 938 |
| West Virginia | #201 | 9 | 1 in 779 |
| California | #223 | 213 | 1 in 1,102 |
| Massachusetts | #233 | 26 | 1 in 1,093 |
| Connecticut | #248 | 13 | 1 in 1,058 |
| New York | #437 | 42 | 1 in 2,298 |
| New Jersey | #509 | 15 | 1 in 2,714 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ashlyn
- 71 spots since 2024 (#901 → #972)
- 371 spots since 2020 (#601 → #972)
- 640 spots since 2015 (#332 → #972)
- Biggest jump: 142 spots in 1986 (#1,071 → #929)
- Biggest drop: 112 spots in 2021 (#601 → #713)
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2005 at #127 (2,539 births)
- Births halved by 2013, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 40 yrs · run 1986–2025
- Highest: 1 in 728 girls born in 2005 were named Ashlyn (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 6,135 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 46.8% of all girls named Ashlyn (22,470) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 94 | #2,938 (1965) | #3,777 |
| 1970s | 149 | #3,236 (1979) | #4,475 |
| 1980s | 1,467 | #572 (1989) | #1,524 |
| 1990s | 10,578 | #191 (1999) | #304 |
| 2000s | 22,470 | #127 (2005) | #148 |
| 2010s | 11,143 | #157 (2010) | #346 |
| 2020s | 2,138 | #601 (2020) | #799 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ashlyn in 2006
Top girls' names in 2006
More about 2006
girls
1,901,209 girls got a published name in 2006; 1 in 773 of them was named Ashlyn, which outranked 99.3% of the 20,064 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- ↑ 8,571Bethzy#9,452 → #881
- ↑ 1,747Rihanna#2,278 → #531
- ↑ 965Yaretzi#1,803 → #838
- ↑ 921Betsy#1,668 → #747
- ↑ 612Evangeline#1,210 → #598
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.