Ashanti
#2,099 for girls in 2025, 89 births · Last seen for boys in 2019 at #12,145
Given to girls 94.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2002 · 2,946 births
- Debut · girls
- 14 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,576since 1970
Ashanti over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,099 | 89 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,980 | 99 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,699 | 121 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,731 | 120 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,897 | 104 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,808 | 109 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,392 | 161 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #1,371 | 164 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,552 | 141 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,434 | 161 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,464 | 157 | #12,086 | 5 |
| 2014 | #1,291 | 184 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,148 | 209 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,214 | 200 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,045 | 236 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #1,063 | 233 | — | |
| 2009 | #998 | 265 | #8,310 | 9 |
| 2008 | #932 | 292 | — | |
| 2007 | #911 | 298 | #8,173 | 9 |
| 2006 | #875 | 303 | — | |
| 2005 | #695 | 398 | — | |
| 2004 | #534 | 532 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #325 | 962 | #9,581 | 6 |
| 2002 | #115 | 2,946 | #3,670 | 23 |
| 2001 | #825 | 281 | #3,512 | 24 |
| 2000 | #1,021 | 206 | #3,922 | 20 |
| 1999 | #880 | 243 | #3,031 | 27 |
| 1998 | #831 | 256 | #2,851 | 28 |
| 1997 | #780 | 267 | #3,261 | 22 |
| 1996 | #692 | 313 | #2,299 | 35 |
| 1995 | #814 | 242 | #2,178 | 37 |
| 1994 | #869 | 225 | #2,307 | 34 |
| 1993 | #881 | 219 | #2,091 | 38 |
| 1992 | #1,059 | 172 | #2,909 | 23 |
| 1991 | #1,335 | 123 | #3,105 | 20 |
| 1990 | #1,397 | 113 | #3,467 | 17 |
| 1989 | #893 | 206 | #2,784 | 22 |
| 1988 | #1,822 | 68 | #3,350 | 15 |
| 1987 | #1,899 | 60 | #3,339 | 14 |
| 1986 | #1,952 | 56 | #4,457 | 9 |
| 1985 | #1,882 | 59 | #5,147 | 7 |
| 1984 | #1,726 | 63 | #2,613 | 18 |
| 1983 | #1,319 | 91 | #3,411 | 12 |
| 1982 | #1,268 | 101 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1981 | #1,382 | 89 | #2,779 | 16 |
| 1980 | #822 | 191 | #2,367 | 21 |
| 1979 | #877 | 175 | #1,487 | 40 |
| 1978 | #1,862 | 53 | #1,913 | 26 |
| 1977 | #2,124 | 44 | #1,948 | 25 |
| 1976 | #2,546 | 31 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | #2,612 | 29 | #2,205 | 20 |
| 1974 | #2,497 | 30 | #1,546 | 32 |
| 1973 | #2,455 | 30 | #2,216 | 18 |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | #2,080 | 19 |
| 1971 | #3,166 | 21 | #3,658 | 8 |
| 1970 | #4,038 | 14 | #2,509 | 14 |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ashanti! It came in at #4,038, and was given to 14 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1970–1972, when fewer than 22 girls a year got the name.
Where Ashanti is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Mississippi#104 · 1 in 429
- Alabama#264 · 1 in 1,161
- South Carolina#329 · 1 in 1,454
- Arkansas#330 · 1 in 1,367
- Illinois#355 · 1 in 1,767
Best ever in a state: #7 in Mississippi, 2002.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi | #104 | 27 | 1 in 429 |
| Alabama | #264 | 17 | 1 in 1,161 |
| South Carolina | #329 | 12 | 1 in 1,454 |
| Arkansas | #330 | 9 | 1 in 1,367 |
| Illinois | #355 | 38 | 1 in 1,767 |
| Louisiana | #412 | 10 | 1 in 1,968 |
| Georgia | #427 | 24 | 1 in 2,141 |
| North Carolina | #453 | 20 | 1 in 2,270 |
| Indiana | #535 | 11 | 1 in 2,955 |
| Florida | #549 | 28 | 1 in 3,061 |
| New Jersey | #565 | 13 | 1 in 3,123 |
| Virginia | #625 | 10 | 1 in 3,711 |
| New York | #630 | 26 | 1 in 3,657 |
| Kentucky | #651 | 5 | 1 in 3,938 |
| Tennessee | #677 | 8 | 1 in 3,884 |
| Utah | #686 | 5 | 1 in 3,680 |
| Wisconsin | #690 | 6 | 1 in 4,175 |
| Massachusetts | #697 | 6 | 1 in 4,749 |
| Maryland | #737 | 6 | 1 in 4,128 |
| Pennsylvania | #841 | 9 | 1 in 6,095 |
| Colorado | #879 | 5 | 1 in 4,945 |
| Texas | #902 | 28 | 1 in 5,736 |
| Ohio | #1,036 | 7 | 1 in 8,183 |
| California | #1,204 | 25 | 1 in 9,217 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ashanti
- 119 spots since 2024 (#1,980 → #2,099)
- 291 spots since 2020 (#1,808 → #2,099)
- 635 spots since 2015 (#1,464 → #2,099)
- Biggest jump: 985 spots in 1979 (#1,862 → #877)
- Biggest drop: 560 spots in 1981 (#822 → #1,382)
- Debuted 1970
- Peaked 2002 at #115 (2,946 births)
- Births halved by 2003, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 2001–2009
- Highest: 1 in 610 girls born in 2002 were named Ashanti (0.16%)
- Latest: 1 in 18,059 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 51.6% of all girls named Ashanti (6,483) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1974, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 448 | #877 (1979) | #2,524 |
| 1980s | 984 | #822 (1980) | #1,497 |
| 1990s | 2,173 | #692 (1996) | #954 |
| 2000s | 6,483 | #115 (2002) | #723 |
| 2010s | 1,846 | #1,045 (2011) | #1,297 |
| 2020s | 642 | #1,699 (2023) | #1,869 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ashanti in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 4,643 of them was named Ashanti, which outranked 96.4% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).