Aseel
#2,485 for girls in 2025, 71 births · #8,910 for boys in 2025, 8 births
Given to girls 88.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 77 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,234since 1988
Aseel over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,485 | 71 | #8,910 | 8 |
| 2024 | #2,434 | 74 | #6,832 | 12 |
| 2023 | #2,852 | 59 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #2,928 | 57 | #6,828 | 12 |
| 2021 | #3,002 | 55 | #8,166 | 9 |
| 2020 | #2,712 | 61 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,538 | 69 | #8,215 | 9 |
| 2018 | #2,532 | 69 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #2,357 | 77 | #6,685 | 12 |
| 2016 | #2,479 | 73 | #6,349 | 13 |
| 2015 | #3,177 | 52 | #6,676 | 12 |
| 2014 | #3,425 | 46 | #7,048 | 11 |
| 2013 | #3,314 | 48 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #3,464 | 46 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #3,999 | 37 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2010 | #6,641 | 19 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #6,811 | 19 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,448 | 34 | — | |
| 2007 | #7,733 | 16 | — | |
| 2006 | #5,383 | 25 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,958 | 26 | — | |
| 2004 | #6,768 | 17 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,668 | 27 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #4,498 | 27 | — | |
| 2001 | #6,067 | 18 | #10,556 | 5 |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,718 | 23 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,123 | 20 | #8,479 | 6 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | — | |
| 1996 | #8,812 | 9 | — | |
| 1995 | #6,641 | 13 | — | |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Aseel! It came in at #10,386, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1990–1993, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Aseel is popular in 2019
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#700 · 1 in 3,625
- New York#1,243 · 1 in 7,718
- Illinois#1,517 · 1 in 10,316
- Texas#3,156 · 1 in 31,711
Best ever in a state: #638 in Michigan, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #700 | 11 | 1 in 3,625 |
| New York | #1,243 | 11 | 1 in 7,718 |
| Illinois | #1,517 | 5 | 1 in 10,316 |
| Texas | #3,156 | 5 | 1 in 31,711 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Aseel
- 51 spots since 2024 (#2,434 → #2,485)
- 227 spots since 2020 (#2,712 → #2,485)
- 692 spots since 2015 (#3,177 → #2,485)
- Debuted 1988
- Peaked 2017 at #2,357 (77 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 21,894 girls born in 2024 were named Aseel (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 22,638 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #2,357 in 2017, was only 1 in 22,422 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 43.4% of all girls named Aseel (536) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 12 | #10,386 (1988) | #10,617 |
| 1990s | 87 | #4,718 (1999) | #6,788 |
| 2000s | 222 | #4,448 (2008) | #5,891 |
| 2010s | 536 | #2,357 (2017) | #3,393 |
| 2020s | 377 | #2,434 (2024) | #2,736 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Aseel in 2019
Top girls' names in 2019
Top boys' names in 2019
More about 2019
girls
1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 24,324 of them was named Aseel, which outranked 85.9% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,508Sirena70
- #2,508Yatziri70
- #2,508Zyra70
- #2,538Aseel69
- #2,538Annalyse69
- #2,538Aylen69
- #2,538Berkleigh69
- #2,561Aaryn68
- #2,561Amaryllis68
- #2,561Anabel68
Tied with 22 names at #2,538; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,794,216 boys got a published name in 2019; 1 in 199,357 of them was named Aseel, which outranked 41.9% of the 14,133 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #7,643Zykeem10
- #7,643Zylas10
- #7,643Zyree10
- #8,215Aseel9
- #8,215Aahaan9
- #8,215Aarian9
- #8,215Aavash9
- #8,889Aakil8
- #8,889Aarik8
- #8,889Aarohan8
Tied with 673 names at #8,215; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.