Arnulfo
#3,757 for boys in 2025, 29 births
- Peak · boys
- 1951 · 96 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,316since 1909
Arnulfo over time
Rank among boys' names. Arnulfo has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | boys | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,757 | 29 |
| 2024 | #5,443 | 17 |
| 2023 | #4,220 | 25 |
| 2022 | #5,633 | 16 |
| 2021 | #4,362 | 23 |
| 2020 | #4,855 | 19 |
| 2019 | #3,794 | 28 |
| 2018 | #4,354 | 23 |
| 2017 | #3,123 | 37 |
| 2016 | #2,993 | 39 |
| 2015 | #3,513 | 31 |
| 2014 | #2,929 | 39 |
| 2013 | #3,189 | 34 |
| 2012 | #2,772 | 43 |
| 2011 | #2,547 | 48 |
| 2010 | #2,826 | 42 |
| 2009 | #2,381 | 54 |
| 2008 | #2,104 | 65 |
| 2007 | #2,071 | 66 |
| 2006 | #1,808 | 76 |
| 2005 | #1,801 | 72 |
| 2004 | #1,671 | 77 |
| 2003 | #1,497 | 86 |
| 2002 | #1,498 | 84 |
| 2001 | #1,415 | 88 |
| 2000 | #1,401 | 89 |
| 1999 | #1,395 | 84 |
| 1998 | #1,449 | 78 |
| 1997 | #1,284 | 89 |
| 1996 | #1,127 | 105 |
| 1995 | #1,159 | 98 |
| 1994 | #1,104 | 104 |
| 1993 | #1,047 | 111 |
| 1992 | #987 | 119 |
| 1991 | #1,071 | 103 |
| 1990 | #1,072 | 98 |
| 1989 | #1,057 | 97 |
| 1988 | #1,124 | 79 |
| 1987 | #1,016 | 87 |
| 1986 | #1,015 | 83 |
| 1985 | #984 | 86 |
| 1984 | #976 | 83 |
| 1983 | #1,028 | 74 |
| 1982 | #950 | 89 |
| 1981 | #964 | 87 |
| 1980 | #911 | 95 |
| 1979 | #952 | 86 |
| 1978 | #996 | 75 |
| 1977 | #913 | 86 |
| 1976 | #892 | 86 |
| 1975 | #894 | 85 |
| 1974 | #914 | 79 |
| 1973 | #843 | 88 |
| 1972 | #1,024 | 62 |
| 1971 | #990 | 67 |
| 1970 | #968 | 69 |
| 1969 | #822 | 88 |
| 1968 | #930 | 61 |
| 1967 | #1,018 | 51 |
| 1966 | #941 | 59 |
| 1965 | #996 | 55 |
| 1964 | #952 | 64 |
| 1963 | #1,100 | 48 |
| 1962 | #1,147 | 45 |
| 1961 | #1,001 | 60 |
| 1960 | #842 | 80 |
| 1959 | #1,019 | 57 |
| 1958 | #956 | 63 |
| 1957 | #1,185 | 43 |
| 1956 | #999 | 56 |
| 1955 | #921 | 65 |
| 1954 | #826 | 77 |
| 1953 | #805 | 79 |
| 1952 | #845 | 68 |
| 1951 | #707 | 96 |
| 1950 | #819 | 69 |
| 1949 | #713 | 93 |
| 1948 | #802 | 71 |
| 1947 | #1,316 | 31 |
| 1946 | #1,060 | 42 |
| 1945 | #1,180 | 31 |
| 1944 | #1,120 | 35 |
| 1943 | #1,106 | 38 |
| 1942 | #1,334 | 27 |
| 1941 | #1,187 | 31 |
| 1940 | #1,107 | 35 |
| 1939 | #1,219 | 29 |
| 1938 | #1,310 | 26 |
| 1937 | #1,119 | 34 |
| 1936 | #1,417 | 22 |
| 1935 | #1,194 | 31 |
| 1934 | #1,323 | 26 |
| 1933 | #1,124 | 34 |
| 1932 | #1,090 | 38 |
| 1931 | #1,361 | 26 |
| 1930 | #892 | 55 |
| 1929 | #995 | 46 |
| 1928 | #1,095 | 41 |
| 1927 | #1,198 | 36 |
| 1926 | #1,092 | 42 |
| 1925 | #1,425 | 27 |
| 1924 | #1,287 | 32 |
| 1923 | #2,224 | 14 |
| 1922 | #1,644 | 22 |
| 1921 | #1,475 | 26 |
| 1920 | #1,966 | 17 |
| 1919 | #1,624 | 21 |
| 1918 | #1,998 | 16 |
| 1917 | #2,280 | 12 |
| 1916 | #1,549 | 21 |
| 1915 | #3,082 | 7 |
| 1914 | #3,264 | 5 |
| 1913 | #2,821 | 5 |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five boys were named Arnulfo! It came in at #1,440, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1909–1914, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Arnulfo is popular in 1999
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- California#625 · 1 in 7,112
- Texas#659 · 1 in 6,860
Best ever in a state: #122 in Arizona, 1916.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #625 | 34 | 1 in 7,112 |
| Texas | #659 | 24 | 1 in 6,860 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Arnulfo
- 1,686 spots since 2024 (#5,443 → #3,757)
- 1,098 spots since 2020 (#4,855 → #3,757)
- 244 spots since 2015 (#3,513 → #3,757)
- Biggest jump: 514 spots in 1948 (#1,316 → #802)
- Biggest drop: 469 spots in 1931 (#892 → #1,361)
- Debuted 1909
- Peaked 1951 at #707 (96 births)
- Births halved by 1957, 6 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 33 yrs · run 1973–1982
- Highest: 1 in 16,785 boys born in 1992 were named Arnulfo (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 58,899 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #707 in 1951, was only 1 in 19,613 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 15.7% of all boys named Arnulfo (989) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 5 | #1,440 (1909) | #1,440 |
| 1910s | 87 | #1,549 (1916) | #2,374 |
| 1920s | 303 | #995 (1929) | #1,440 |
| 1930s | 321 | #892 (1930) | #1,205 |
| 1940s | 434 | #713 (1949) | #1,093 |
| 1950s | 673 | #707 (1951) | #908 |
| 1960s | 611 | #822 (1969) | #975 |
| 1970s | 783 | #843 (1973) | #939 |
| 1980s | 860 | #911 (1980) | #1,003 |
| 1990s | 989 | #987 (1992) | #1,170 |
| 2000s | 757 | #1,401 (2000) | #1,765 |
| 2010s | 364 | #2,547 (2011) | #3,204 |
| 2020s | 129 | #3,757 (2025) | #4,712 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Arnulfo in 1999
Top boys' names in 1999
More about 1999
boys
1,920,150 boys got a published name in 1999; 1 in 22,859 of them was named Arnulfo, which outranked 88.0% of the 11,614 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 14.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,383Lucio85
- #1,383Naseem85
- #1,383Tremaine85
- #1,395Arnulfo84
- #1,395Cristofer84
- #1,395Demario84
- #1,395Eleazar84
- #1,408Akash83
- #1,408Garry83
- #1,408Geovanni83
Tied with 12 names at #1,395; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.