Arlene
#1,631 for girls in 2025, 127 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,229
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1934 · 3,917 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 14 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 143,010since 1888
Arlene over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,631 | 127 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,796 | 112 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,802 | 112 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,742 | 119 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,768 | 115 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,571 | 134 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,724 | 120 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,787 | 114 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,465 | 153 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,523 | 148 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,382 | 171 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,487 | 150 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,425 | 159 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,452 | 157 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,311 | 179 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,165 | 208 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,258 | 194 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,104 | 234 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,141 | 225 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,056 | 242 | — | |
| 2005 | #830 | 307 | — | |
| 2004 | #974 | 244 | — | |
| 2003 | #849 | 285 | — | |
| 2002 | #759 | 318 | — | |
| 2001 | #827 | 280 | — | |
| 2000 | #798 | 286 | — | |
| 1999 | #722 | 313 | — | |
| 1998 | #726 | 304 | — | |
| 1997 | #679 | 319 | — | |
| 1996 | #705 | 302 | — | |
| 1995 | #705 | 297 | — | |
| 1994 | #702 | 298 | — | |
| 1993 | #652 | 342 | — | |
| 1992 | #616 | 369 | — | |
| 1991 | #659 | 332 | — | |
| 1990 | #679 | 314 | — | |
| 1989 | #622 | 341 | #6,229 | 7 |
| 1988 | #591 | 341 | — | |
| 1987 | #550 | 364 | — | |
| 1986 | #564 | 353 | #5,926 | 6 |
| 1985 | #568 | 347 | — | |
| 1984 | #543 | 350 | — | |
| 1983 | #516 | 369 | — | |
| 1982 | #487 | 421 | — | |
| 1981 | #495 | 413 | — | |
| 1980 | #520 | 371 | — | |
| 1979 | #564 | 325 | — | |
| 1978 | #521 | 355 | — | |
| 1977 | #487 | 391 | — | |
| 1976 | #462 | 416 | — | |
| 1975 | #461 | 408 | — | |
| 1974 | #444 | 435 | — | |
| 1973 | #400 | 501 | — | |
| 1972 | #401 | 500 | — | |
| 1971 | #380 | 605 | — | |
| 1970 | #349 | 718 | — | |
| 1969 | #330 | 737 | — | |
| 1968 | #324 | 719 | — | |
| 1967 | #310 | 773 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #279 | 911 | — | |
| 1965 | #266 | 1,054 | — | |
| 1964 | #253 | 1,225 | — | |
| 1963 | #245 | 1,295 | #3,646 | 6 |
| 1962 | #237 | 1,341 | — | |
| 1961 | #216 | 1,554 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #211 | 1,625 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #199 | 1,790 | — | |
| 1958 | #192 | 1,778 | — | |
| 1957 | #203 | 1,693 | #3,552 | 6 |
| 1956 | #191 | 1,807 | — | |
| 1955 | #175 | 1,982 | #3,886 | 5 |
| 1954 | #169 | 2,075 | #3,827 | 5 |
| 1953 | #153 | 2,305 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #147 | 2,330 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #134 | 2,502 | — | |
| 1950 | #132 | 2,390 | #3,681 | 5 |
| 1949 | #133 | 2,395 | — | |
| 1948 | #125 | 2,480 | #3,668 | 5 |
| 1947 | #118 | 2,907 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #113 | 2,801 | #2,919 | 7 |
| 1945 | #99 | 2,771 | #2,743 | 7 |
| 1944 | #101 | 2,714 | #1,988 | 13 |
| 1943 | #90 | 3,146 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #83 | 3,331 | #1,730 | 17 |
| 1941 | #77 | 3,291 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #75 | 3,257 | #1,802 | 15 |
| 1939 | #69 | 3,578 | #1,489 | 20 |
| 1938 | #63 | 3,894 | #1,521 | 20 |
| 1937 | #60 | 3,805 | #1,403 | 23 |
| 1936 | #54 | 3,898 | #1,801 | 15 |
| 1935 | #59 | 3,684 | #2,719 | 8 |
| 1934 | #53 | 3,917 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #74 | 3,185 | #2,368 | 10 |
| 1932 | #80 | 3,109 | #1,922 | 15 |
| 1931 | #77 | 3,217 | #2,328 | 11 |
| 1930 | #103 | 2,509 | #2,178 | 13 |
| 1929 | #105 | 2,398 | #2,980 | 8 |
| 1928 | #106 | 2,521 | #2,659 | 10 |
| 1927 | #108 | 2,563 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #108 | 2,522 | #2,904 | 9 |
| 1925 | #120 | 2,275 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #122 | 2,277 | — | |
| 1923 | #127 | 2,090 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #133 | 1,884 | #3,872 | 6 |
| 1921 | #138 | 1,837 | — | |
| 1920 | #145 | 1,594 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #156 | 1,427 | — | |
| 1918 | #165 | 1,340 | — | |
| 1917 | #167 | 1,208 | — | |
| 1916 | #172 | 1,105 | #3,897 | 5 |
| 1915 | #193 | 864 | — | |
| 1914 | #209 | 608 | — | |
| 1913 | #218 | 471 | — | |
| 1912 | #246 | 325 | — | |
| 1911 | #257 | 226 | — | |
| 1910 | #268 | 207 | — | |
| 1909 | #282 | 160 | — | |
| 1908 | #296 | 143 | — | |
| 1907 | #351 | 101 | — | |
| 1906 | #325 | 107 | — | |
| 1905 | #386 | 77 | — | |
| 1904 | #421 | 59 | — | |
| 1903 | #388 | 67 | — | |
| 1902 | #459 | 47 | — | |
| 1901 | #487 | 38 | — | |
| 1900 | #494 | 47 | — | |
| 1899 | #514 | 33 | — | |
| 1898 | #586 | 30 | — | |
| 1897 | #567 | 28 | — | |
| 1896 | #514 | 33 | — | |
| 1895 | #638 | 23 | — | |
| 1894 | #682 | 19 | — | |
| 1893 | #713 | 17 | — | |
| 1892 | #666 | 19 | — | |
| 1891 | #750 | 13 | — | |
| 1890 | #825 | 11 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | — | |
| 1888 | #894 | 9 | — | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1888
The first year at least five girls were named Arlene! It came in at #894, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Arlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 165 spots since 2024 (#1,796 → #1,631)
- 60 spots since 2020 (#1,571 → #1,631)
- 249 spots since 2015 (#1,382 → #1,631)
- Biggest jump: 454 spots in 1890 (#1,279 → #825)
- Biggest drop: 385 spots in 1889 (#894 → #1,279)
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1888
- Peaked 1934 at #53 (3,917 births)
- Births halved by 1956, 22 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1931–1943
- Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1890–2005
Share of babies · girls
1 in 267
- Highest: 1 in 267 girls born in 1934 were named Arlene (0.38%)
- Latest: 1 in 12,656 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
- 24.3% of all girls named Arlene (34,796) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 14 | #894 (1888) | #1,087 |
| 1890s | 226 | #514 (1896) | #646 |
| 1900s | 846 | #282 (1909) | #389 |
| 1910s | 7,781 | #156 (1919) | #205 |
| 1920s | 21,961 | #105 (1929) | #121 |
| 1930s | 34,796 | #53 (1934) | #69 |
| 1940s | 29,093 | #75 (1940) | #101 |
| 1950s | 20,652 | #132 (1950) | #170 |
| 1960s | 11,234 | #211 (1960) | #267 |
| 1970s | 4,654 | #349 (1970) | #447 |
| 1980s | 3,670 | #487 (1982) | #546 |
| 1990s | 3,190 | #616 (1992) | #685 |
| 2000s | 2,615 | #759 (2002) | #960 |
| 2010s | 1,559 | #1,165 (2010) | #1,472 |
| 2020s | 719 | #1,571 (2020) | #1,718 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Arlene in 1912
girls
#246
325 births · 1 in 1,717 girls
Top girls' names in 1912
More about 1912
girls
558,119 girls got a published name in 1912; 1 in 1,717 of them was named Arlene, which outranked 92.9% of the 3,445 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Arlene
Biggest movers since 1911
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.