Arleigh
#6,116 for girls in 2025, 19 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #10,821
Given to girls 57.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 43 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 710since 1924
Arleigh over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,116 | 19 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,893 | 27 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,454 | 31 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #4,108 | 35 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #4,167 | 34 | — | |
| 2020 | #4,548 | 29 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,006 | 36 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,768 | 28 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #3,552 | 43 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,849 | 39 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,236 | 20 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,544 | 31 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,755 | 29 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,486 | 32 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,207 | 26 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,414 | 25 | — | |
| 2009 | #5,378 | 26 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,750 | 24 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #6,812 | 19 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #7,500 | 15 | — | |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | — | |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 | — | |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | — | |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | — | |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | — | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | — | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | — | |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | #3,041 | 8 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,097 | 8 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,944 | 5 | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #2,263 | 13 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,201 | 7 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,364 | 6 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #2,337 | 11 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,919 | 7 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,309 | 10 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,405 | 10 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,212 | 6 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,133 | 6 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,130 | 6 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,050 | 12 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,976 | 13 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,197 | 11 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,452 | 9 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,127 | 12 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,393 | 10 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,905 | 14 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,313 | 11 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,003 | 14 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,247 | 7 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | — | #2,523 | 11 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,605 | 22 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,435 | 12 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #3,023 | 9 |
| 1923 | — | #2,331 | 13 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,040 | 16 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,588 | 23 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,336 | 13 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,385 | 12 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,260 | 13 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,280 | 12 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,782 | 16 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,821 | 5 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #1,137 | 5 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Arleigh! It came in at #5,061, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1924–1983, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Arleigh
- 1,223 spots since 2024 (#4,893 → #6,116)
- 1,568 spots since 2020 (#4,548 → #6,116)
- 120 spots since 2015 (#6,236 → #6,116)
- Debuted 1924
- Peaked 2017 at #3,552 (43 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 40,150 girls born in 2017 were named Arleigh (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 84,593 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 43.5% of all girls named Arleigh (309) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1983, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 10 | #4,725 (1928) | #4,893 |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 0 | — | — |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 0 | — | — |
| 1970s | 0 | — | — |
| 1980s | 17 | #8,153 (1984) | #10,052 |
| 1990s | 38 | #7,104 (1998) | #9,664 |
| 2000s | 161 | #5,378 (2009) | #7,665 |
| 2010s | 309 | #3,552 (2017) | #4,682 |
| 2020s | 175 | #4,108 (2022) | #4,714 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Arleigh in 1924
Top girls' names in 1924
Top boys' names in 1924
More about 1924
girls
1,248,872 girls got a published name in 1924; 1 in 249,774 of them was named Arleigh, which outranked 14.2% of the 5,900 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 839 names at #5,061; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,132,742 boys got a published name in 1924; 1 in 125,860 of them was named Arleigh, which outranked 39.2% of the 4,970 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,822Woodford10
- #2,822Yoshiyuki10
- #2,822Zygmunt10
- #3,023Arleigh9
- #3,023Adalberto9
- #3,023Adolpho9
- #3,023Alvey9
- #3,260Achilles8
- #3,260Adger8
- #3,260Admiral8
Tied with 236 names at #3,023; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.