Anabell
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #15,293
- Peak · girls
- 2013 · 95 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,429since 1922
Anabell over time
Rank among girls' names. Anabell has never cracked the top 2,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 |
| 2023 | #8,486 | 12 |
| 2022 | #12,243 | 7 |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 |
| 2019 | #7,342 | 15 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 |
| 2017 | #5,338 | 24 |
| 2016 | #4,531 | 31 |
| 2015 | #3,915 | 38 |
| 2014 | #2,194 | 86 |
| 2013 | #2,032 | 95 |
| 2012 | #2,336 | 80 |
| 2011 | #2,258 | 83 |
| 2010 | #2,360 | 80 |
| 2009 | #2,531 | 74 |
| 2008 | #2,609 | 71 |
| 2007 | #3,482 | 47 |
| 2006 | #3,505 | 45 |
| 2005 | #3,257 | 47 |
| 2004 | #4,492 | 30 |
| 2003 | #4,220 | 31 |
| 2002 | #3,654 | 36 |
| 2001 | #6,067 | 18 |
| 2000 | #4,649 | 25 |
| 1999 | #3,970 | 29 |
| 1998 | #4,366 | 25 |
| 1997 | #6,163 | 15 |
| 1996 | #5,531 | 17 |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 |
| 1994 | #7,604 | 11 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 |
| 1991 | #5,659 | 16 |
| 1990 | #4,523 | 21 |
| 1989 | #4,848 | 18 |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 |
| 1986 | #5,188 | 14 |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 |
| 1984 | #5,899 | 11 |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 |
| 1981 | #5,254 | 13 |
| 1980 | #3,719 | 21 |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 |
| 1973 | #5,580 | 9 |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 |
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 |
| 1965 | #4,831 | 8 |
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Anabell! It came in at #5,009, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1922–1961, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Anabell is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#944 · 1 in 5,749
- California#1,157 · 1 in 7,891
Best ever in a state: #649 in Oregon, 2010.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #944 | 28 | 1 in 5,749 |
| California | #1,157 | 26 | 1 in 7,891 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Anabell
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Debuted 1922
- Peaked 2013 at #2,032 (95 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 18,471 girls born in 2013 were named Anabell (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 324,038 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- 38.0% of all girls named Anabell (543) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 5 | #5,009 (1922) | #5,009 |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 0 | — | — |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 46 | #4,723 (1969) | #5,222 |
| 1970s | 73 | #4,652 (1977) | #6,732 |
| 1980s | 131 | #3,719 (1980) | #5,989 |
| 1990s | 167 | #3,970 (1999) | #6,042 |
| 2000s | 424 | #2,531 (2009) | #3,847 |
| 2010s | 543 | #2,032 (2013) | #4,146 |
| 2020s | 40 | #8,486 (2023) | #11,806 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Anabell in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 18,471 of them was named Anabell, which outranked 89.5% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,020Shaelyn96
- #2,020Shira96
- #2,020Theodora96
- #2,032Anabell95
- #2,032Ariadna95
- #2,032Aylah95
- #2,032Bernadette95
- #2,052Annemarie94
- #2,052Elli94
- #2,052Elyana94
Tied with 19 names at #2,032; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.