Amparo
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · Last seen for boys in 1986 at #5,332
Given to girls 99.5% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1928 · 73 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,316since 1911
Amparo over time
Rank among girls' names. Amparo has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | — | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | — | |
| 2023 | #11,169 | 8 | — | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | — | |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | — | |
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | #12,713 | 7 | — | |
| 2016 | #10,859 | 9 | — | |
| 2015 | #8,008 | 14 | — | |
| 2014 | #14,558 | 6 | — | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #12,199 | 8 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | — | |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | — | |
| 2009 | #11,459 | 9 | — | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | — | |
| 2007 | #8,098 | 15 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #6,820 | 17 | — | |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | — | |
| 2003 | #6,055 | 19 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,129 | 18 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | — | |
| 2000 | #5,312 | 21 | — | |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 | — | |
| 1998 | #4,366 | 25 | — | |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,831 | 28 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,585 | 30 | — | |
| 1994 | #4,016 | 26 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,681 | 29 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,144 | 36 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,159 | 35 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,436 | 31 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,522 | 20 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,039 | 33 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,524 | 25 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,054 | 30 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #4,126 | 19 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,613 | 22 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,975 | 28 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,017 | 29 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,158 | 47 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,800 | 32 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,477 | 37 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,859 | 28 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,666 | 31 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,210 | 38 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,023 | 43 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,497 | 30 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,979 | 41 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,975 | 41 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,801 | 25 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,307 | 33 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,396 | 29 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,205 | 30 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,212 | 29 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,308 | 27 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,204 | 29 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,348 | 27 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,543 | 23 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,782 | 41 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,117 | 31 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,150 | 29 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,108 | 29 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,588 | 45 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,989 | 30 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,005 | 29 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,667 | 38 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,875 | 31 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,531 | 41 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,611 | 36 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,481 | 40 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,352 | 46 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,603 | 34 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,298 | 50 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,357 | 46 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,394 | 39 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,514 | 29 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,698 | 24 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,703 | 25 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,387 | 34 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,418 | 30 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,150 | 40 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #1,474 | 26 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,091 | 43 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,234 | 34 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,375 | 28 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,182 | 36 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,062 | 43 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,123 | 39 | — | |
| 1932 | #905 | 60 | — | |
| 1931 | #887 | 60 | #3,763 | 5 |
| 1930 | #1,002 | 54 | — | |
| 1929 | #895 | 64 | — | |
| 1928 | #845 | 73 | — | |
| 1927 | #863 | 73 | — | |
| 1926 | #879 | 71 | — | |
| 1925 | #988 | 57 | — | |
| 1924 | #920 | 68 | — | |
| 1923 | #992 | 57 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,168 | 43 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,276 | 37 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,132 | 44 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,565 | 26 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,537 | 27 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,923 | 18 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,867 | 18 | — | |
| 1915 | #3,134 | 8 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,009 | 12 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,883 | 11 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,634 | 6 | — | |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | — | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Amparo! It came in at #2,191, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2018, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
See more about Amparo
- 4,376 spots since 2024 (#15,293 → #10,917)
- 2,909 spots since 2015 (#8,008 → #10,917)
- Biggest jump: 176 spots in 1923 (#1,168 → #992)
- Biggest drop: 218 spots in 1933 (#905 → #1,123)
- Debuted 1911
- Peaked 1928 at #845 (73 births)
- Births halved by 1935, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 1923–1929
- Highest: 1 in 15,799 girls born in 1928 were named Amparo (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 200,908 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 17.7% of all girls named Amparo (587) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 132 | #1,537 (1918) | #2,083 |
| 1920s | 587 | #845 (1928) | #996 |
| 1930s | 423 | #887 (1931) | #1,134 |
| 1940s | 351 | #1,150 (1940) | #1,452 |
| 1950s | 365 | #1,352 (1950) | #1,721 |
| 1960s | 295 | #1,782 (1962) | #2,227 |
| 1970s | 347 | #1,975 (1972) | #2,379 |
| 1980s | 285 | #2,158 (1981) | #3,283 |
| 1990s | 275 | #3,144 (1992) | #4,071 |
| 2000s | 149 | #5,312 (2000) | #8,191 |
| 2010s | 73 | #8,008 (2015) | #12,208 |
| 2020s | 34 | #10,917 (2025) | #12,772 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amparo in 1931
Top girls' names in 1931
Top boys' names in 1931
More about 1931
girls
1,064,728 girls got a published name in 1931; 1 in 17,745 of them was named Amparo, which outranked 82.2% of the 4,979 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,039,665 boys got a published name in 1931; 1 in 207,933 of them was named Amparo, which outranked 12.9% of the 4,321 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 558 names at #3,763; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.