Amelia
#4 for girls in 2025, 12,699 births · #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 12,786 births
- Debut · girls
- 221 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 27 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 281,130since 1880
Amelia over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4 | 12,699 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #3 | 12,786 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #4 | 12,365 | #9,763 | 7 |
| 2022 | #4 | 12,415 | #6,479 | 13 |
| 2021 | #4 | 13,041 | #8,825 | 8 |
| 2020 | #6 | 12,802 | #10,605 | 6 |
| 2019 | #7 | 12,944 | #6,104 | 14 |
| 2018 | #8 | 12,405 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #8 | 11,870 | #6,685 | 12 |
| 2016 | #10 | 10,809 | #9,664 | 7 |
| 2015 | #12 | 9,878 | — | |
| 2014 | #15 | 8,805 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #17 | 8,052 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #23 | 7,249 | — | |
| 2011 | #30 | 6,374 | #9,600 | 7 |
| 2010 | #41 | 5,464 | — | |
| 2009 | #55 | 4,705 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #68 | 4,352 | — | |
| 2007 | #77 | 4,194 | #9,788 | 7 |
| 2006 | #83 | 4,065 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #84 | 3,912 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #96 | 3,354 | #5,492 | 14 |
| 2003 | #111 | 3,097 | — | |
| 2002 | #139 | 2,444 | — | |
| 2001 | #199 | 1,638 | — | |
| 2000 | #207 | 1,531 | — | |
| 1999 | #225 | 1,421 | — | |
| 1998 | #215 | 1,425 | — | |
| 1997 | #228 | 1,317 | — | |
| 1996 | #222 | 1,292 | — | |
| 1995 | #237 | 1,207 | — | |
| 1994 | #226 | 1,255 | — | |
| 1993 | #224 | 1,248 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #214 | 1,345 | — | |
| 1991 | #194 | 1,536 | #8,236 | 5 |
| 1990 | #194 | 1,513 | — | |
| 1989 | #216 | 1,265 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #232 | 1,130 | — | |
| 1987 | #254 | 1,006 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #252 | 1,020 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #249 | 1,015 | — | |
| 1984 | #232 | 1,094 | #5,561 | 6 |
| 1983 | #304 | 762 | #5,484 | 6 |
| 1982 | #297 | 832 | — | |
| 1981 | #286 | 848 | — | |
| 1980 | #316 | 768 | — | |
| 1979 | #337 | 702 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #339 | 643 | — | |
| 1977 | #362 | 601 | — | |
| 1976 | #394 | 523 | — | |
| 1975 | #387 | 523 | — | |
| 1974 | #399 | 507 | — | |
| 1973 | #436 | 442 | — | |
| 1972 | #458 | 406 | — | |
| 1971 | #432 | 481 | — | |
| 1970 | #445 | 493 | — | |
| 1969 | #445 | 465 | — | |
| 1968 | #489 | 390 | — | |
| 1967 | #445 | 450 | — | |
| 1966 | #452 | 431 | — | |
| 1965 | #431 | 475 | — | |
| 1964 | #438 | 503 | — | |
| 1963 | #433 | 503 | — | |
| 1962 | #436 | 494 | — | |
| 1961 | #407 | 571 | #4,065 | 5 |
| 1960 | #414 | 542 | — | |
| 1959 | #424 | 502 | — | |
| 1958 | #427 | 484 | — | |
| 1957 | #404 | 520 | — | |
| 1956 | #392 | 526 | — | |
| 1955 | #383 | 530 | — | |
| 1954 | #380 | 511 | — | |
| 1953 | #360 | 552 | — | |
| 1952 | #350 | 549 | — | |
| 1951 | #345 | 532 | — | |
| 1950 | #357 | 483 | — | |
| 1949 | #320 | 589 | — | |
| 1948 | #330 | 564 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #343 | 539 | — | |
| 1946 | #317 | 547 | — | |
| 1945 | #312 | 474 | — | |
| 1944 | #307 | 476 | — | |
| 1943 | #292 | 559 | — | |
| 1942 | #290 | 543 | — | |
| 1941 | #279 | 529 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #279 | 504 | — | |
| 1939 | #282 | 489 | — | |
| 1938 | #265 | 570 | — | |
| 1937 | #245 | 647 | — | |
| 1936 | #254 | 580 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #255 | 604 | #2,951 | 7 |
| 1934 | #264 | 553 | — | |
| 1933 | #246 | 608 | — | |
| 1932 | #243 | 637 | #2,638 | 9 |
| 1931 | #248 | 591 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | #236 | 679 | #2,293 | 12 |
| 1929 | #229 | 687 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #227 | 755 | — | |
| 1927 | #235 | 754 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #236 | 746 | #3,385 | 7 |
| 1925 | #216 | 889 | #4,197 | 5 |
| 1924 | #216 | 910 | — | |
| 1923 | #205 | 965 | — | |
| 1922 | #195 | 1,032 | — | |
| 1921 | #200 | 995 | #3,517 | 7 |
| 1920 | #190 | 1,054 | — | |
| 1919 | #181 | 1,085 | — | |
| 1918 | #183 | 1,115 | — | |
| 1917 | #173 | 1,160 | — | |
| 1916 | #167 | 1,159 | — | |
| 1915 | #165 | 1,115 | — | |
| 1914 | #156 | 926 | — | |
| 1913 | #161 | 721 | — | |
| 1912 | #160 | 672 | — | |
| 1911 | #174 | 430 | — | |
| 1910 | #163 | 449 | — | |
| 1909 | #163 | 388 | — | |
| 1908 | #163 | 370 | — | |
| 1907 | #163 | 380 | — | |
| 1906 | #160 | 358 | — | |
| 1905 | #155 | 365 | — | |
| 1904 | #153 | 353 | — | |
| 1903 | #150 | 347 | — | |
| 1902 | #149 | 355 | — | |
| 1901 | #140 | 350 | — | |
| 1900 | #146 | 398 | — | |
| 1899 | #140 | 332 | — | |
| 1898 | #140 | 360 | — | |
| 1897 | #121 | 408 | — | |
| 1896 | #131 | 365 | — | |
| 1895 | #125 | 379 | — | |
| 1894 | #119 | 390 | — | |
| 1893 | #114 | 385 | — | |
| 1892 | #118 | 385 | — | |
| 1891 | #112 | 353 | — | |
| 1890 | #109 | 368 | — | |
| 1889 | #110 | 346 | — | |
| 1888 | #108 | 358 | — | |
| 1887 | #93 | 344 | — | |
| 1886 | #101 | 326 | — | |
| 1885 | #102 | 298 | — | |
| 1884 | #96 | 315 | — | |
| 1883 | #97 | 262 | — | |
| 1882 | #102 | 252 | — | |
| 1881 | #93 | 235 | — | |
| 1880 | #96 | 221 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Amelia was already there! It came in at #96, and was given to 221 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1886, when fewer than 330 girls a year got the name.
See more about Amelia
- 1 spot since 2024 (#3 → #4)
- 2 spots since 2020 (#6 → #4)
- 8 spots since 2015 (#12 → #4)
- Biggest jump: 72 spots in 1984 (#304 → #232)
- Biggest drop: 44 spots in 1968 (#445 → #489)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2024 at #3 (12,786 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
- Top 100: 27 yrs · run 2004–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 126 girls born in 2021 were named Amelia (0.79%)
- Latest: 1 in 127 girls born in 2025 (0.79%)
- Its best rank, #3 in 2024, was only 1 in 127 (0.79%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 33.4% of all girls named Amelia (93,850) were born in this decade
- Comeback: #93 (1887) → #489 (1968) → #3 (2024)
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,957 | #93 (1887) | #100 |
| 1890s | 3,725 | #109 (1890) | #123 |
| 1900s | 3,664 | #140 (1901) | #154 |
| 1910s | 8,832 | #156 (1914) | #168 |
| 1920s | 8,787 | #190 (1920) | #215 |
| 1930s | 5,958 | #236 (1930) | #254 |
| 1940s | 5,324 | #279 (1941) | #307 |
| 1950s | 5,189 | #345 (1951) | #382 |
| 1960s | 4,824 | #407 (1961) | #439 |
| 1970s | 5,321 | #337 (1979) | #399 |
| 1980s | 9,740 | #216 (1989) | #264 |
| 1990s | 13,559 | #194 (1991) | #218 |
| 2000s | 33,292 | #55 (2009) | #112 |
| 2010s | 93,850 | #7 (2019) | #17 |
| 2020s | 76,108 | #3 (2024) | #4 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amelia in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 1,675 of them was named Amelia, which outranked 95.2% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 116,017 of them was named Amelia, which outranked 38.4% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,465Woodson10
- #2,465Ygnacio10
- #2,465Zeke10
- #2,638Amelia9
- #2,638Abran9
- #2,638Acy9
- #2,638Admiral9
- #2,849Abelino8
- #2,849Abundio8
- #2,849Allard8
Tied with 210 names at #2,638; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.