Amariah
#1,150 for girls in 2025, 201 births · #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
Given to girls 99.3% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 201 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,763since 1980
Amariah over time
Rank among girls' names. Amariah has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,150 | 201 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #1,284 | 180 | #10,938 | 6 |
| 2023 | #1,391 | 161 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #1,659 | 127 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #1,680 | 123 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,552 | 136 | #9,554 | 7 |
| 2019 | #1,585 | 134 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,532 | 142 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,364 | 169 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,590 | 139 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,667 | 128 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,590 | 135 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,557 | 139 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,379 | 169 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,372 | 167 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,328 | 177 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,328 | 181 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,486 | 157 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,480 | 157 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,651 | 128 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,731 | 114 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,895 | 99 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,915 | 95 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,142 | 78 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,540 | 60 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,940 | 48 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,782 | 49 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,426 | 35 | — | |
| 1997 | #5,228 | 19 | — | |
| 1996 | #3,942 | 27 | — | |
| 1995 | #5,439 | 17 | — | |
| 1994 | #7,097 | 12 | — | |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | — | |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | — | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | — | |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | #10,386 | 6 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | — | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Amariah! It came in at #10,392, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1982–1987, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Amariah is popular in 2004
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Colorado#743 · 1 in 4,116
- Tennessee#901 · 1 in 6,092
- Georgia#1,015 · 1 in 6,316
- Ohio#1,325 · 1 in 11,504
- Illinois#1,410 · 1 in 11,416
Best ever in a state: #159 in New Mexico, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | #743 | 6 | 1 in 4,116 |
| Tennessee | #901 | 5 | 1 in 6,092 |
| Georgia | #1,015 | 8 | 1 in 6,316 |
| Ohio | #1,325 | 5 | 1 in 11,504 |
| Illinois | #1,410 | 6 | 1 in 11,416 |
| Florida | #1,642 | 6 | 1 in 13,668 |
| California | #2,139 | 10 | 1 in 22,883 |
| Texas | #2,512 | 6 | 1 in 26,547 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amariah
- 134 spots since 2024 (#1,284 → #1,150)
- 402 spots since 2020 (#1,552 → #1,150)
- 517 spots since 2015 (#1,667 → #1,150)
- Debuted 1980
- Peaked 2025 at #1,150 (201 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 7,996 girls born in 2025 were named Amariah (0.01%)
- 39.8% of all girls named Amariah (1,499) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 17 | #9,110 (1981) | #9,963 |
| 1990s | 202 | #2,782 (1999) | #6,198 |
| 2000s | 1,117 | #1,328 (2009) | #1,911 |
| 2010s | 1,499 | #1,328 (2010) | #1,496 |
| 2020s | 928 | #1,150 (2025) | #1,453 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amariah in 2004
Top girls' names in 2004
More about 2004
girls
1,836,250 girls got a published name in 2004; 1 in 18,548 of them was named Amariah, which outranked 89.9% of the 18,835 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,883Suzanna100
- #1,883Tierney100
- #1,883Tyasia100
- #1,895Amariah99
- #1,895Abbigale99
- #1,895Brooklin99
- #1,895Grayce99
- #1,909Adalyn98
- #1,909Amayah98
- #1,909Anijah98
Tied with 13 names at #1,895; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.