Amando
Last seen for girls in 1993 at #13,442 · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to boys 90.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1943 · 16 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,253since 1913
Amando over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #9,714 | 7 | |
| 2024 | — | #9,894 | 7 | |
| 2023 | — | #9,763 | 7 | |
| 2022 | — | #12,330 | 5 | |
| 2021 | — | #8,166 | 9 | |
| 2020 | — | #8,067 | 9 | |
| 2019 | — | #9,756 | 7 | |
| 2018 | — | #8,154 | 9 | |
| 2017 | — | #6,685 | 12 | |
| 2016 | — | #8,146 | 9 | |
| 2015 | — | #8,744 | 8 | |
| 2014 | — | #7,048 | 11 | |
| 2013 | — | #9,655 | 7 | |
| 2012 | — | #8,864 | 8 | |
| 2011 | — | #8,079 | 9 | |
| 2010 | — | #8,803 | 8 | |
| 2009 | — | #6,436 | 13 | |
| 2008 | — | #5,067 | 18 | |
| 2007 | — | #6,622 | 12 | |
| 2006 | — | #6,460 | 12 | |
| 2005 | — | #4,631 | 18 | |
| 2004 | — | #4,602 | 18 | |
| 2003 | — | #4,276 | 19 | |
| 2002 | — | #3,188 | 28 | |
| 2001 | — | #3,974 | 20 | |
| 2000 | — | #6,839 | 9 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,704 | 20 | |
| 1998 | — | #3,708 | 19 | |
| 1997 | — | #3,160 | 23 | |
| 1996 | — | #5,187 | 11 | |
| 1995 | — | #3,559 | 18 | |
| 1994 | — | #3,326 | 20 | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #3,042 | 22 |
| 1992 | — | #3,604 | 17 | |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 | #3,325 | 18 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #3,971 | 14 |
| 1989 | #6,955 | 11 | #3,809 | 14 |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | #3,521 | 13 |
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | #2,510 | 21 |
| 1985 | #4,860 | 15 | #3,401 | 13 |
| 1984 | — | #4,552 | 8 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #5,209 | 13 | #3,108 | 14 |
| 1981 | #6,804 | 9 | #2,496 | 19 |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | #2,444 | 20 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #3,357 | 12 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #4,554 | 7 |
| 1977 | — | #2,556 | 17 | |
| 1976 | — | #3,095 | 12 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,205 | 20 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,513 | 15 | |
| 1972 | — | #2,418 | 15 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,370 | 9 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,521 | 8 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,682 | 11 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,735 | 10 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,906 | 17 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,132 | 14 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,617 | 10 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,854 | 9 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,318 | 7 | |
| 1962 | — | #3,305 | 7 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,356 | 7 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,665 | 6 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,530 | 11 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,642 | 10 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,887 | 18 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,091 | 15 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,505 | 6 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,592 | 10 | |
| 1953 | — | #3,425 | 6 | |
| 1952 | — | #3,095 | 7 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,135 | 13 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #2,606 | 9 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,668 | 5 | |
| 1947 | — | #2,862 | 8 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,143 | 12 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,393 | 9 | |
| 1944 | — | #3,430 | 5 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,833 | 16 | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #2,333 | 10 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,179 | 11 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,449 | 9 | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #2,184 | 11 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,396 | 10 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,022 | 13 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,642 | 5 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,465 | 10 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,651 | 9 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,199 | 13 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,387 | 12 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,408 | 12 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,725 | 10 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,089 | 15 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,641 | 11 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,331 | 13 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,252 | 8 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,804 | 10 | |
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | #3,391 | 7 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,882 | 9 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,956 | 8 | |
| 1916 | — | #3,177 | 7 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,082 | 7 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,915 | 6 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,821 | 5 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Amando! It came in at #2,821, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1920, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Amando
- 180 spots since 2024 (#9,894 → #9,714)
- 1,647 spots since 2020 (#8,067 → #9,714)
- 970 spots since 2015 (#8,744 → #9,714)
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 1943 at #1,833 (16 births)
- Births halved by 1944, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 69,340 boys born in 2002 were named Amando (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 244,011 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,833 in 1943, was only 1 in 89,206 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 14.5% of all boys named Amando (182) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1988, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 49 | #2,821 (1913) | #3,032 |
| 1920s | 104 | #2,089 (1925) | #2,537 |
| 1930s | 76 | #2,022 (1934) | #2,574 |
| 1940s | 85 | #1,833 (1943) | #2,605 |
| 1950s | 96 | #1,887 (1957) | #2,656 |
| 1960s | 98 | #1,906 (1967) | #2,857 |
| 1970s | 124 | #2,205 (1975) | #3,115 |
| 1980s | 140 | #2,444 (1980) | #3,493 |
| 1990s | 182 | #3,042 (1993) | #3,659 |
| 2000s | 167 | #3,188 (2002) | #5,210 |
| 2010s | 88 | #6,685 (2017) | #8,393 |
| 2020s | 44 | #8,067 (2020) | #9,656 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amando in 1986
Top girls' names in 1986
Top boys' names in 1986
More about 1986
girls
1,715,547 girls got a published name in 1986; 1 in 190,616 of them was named Amando, which outranked 44.4% of the 12,836 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #6,612Zanetta10
- #6,612Zaynab10
- #6,612Zully10
- #7,134Amando9
- #7,134Aarin9
- #7,134Aarti9
- #7,134Adel9
- #7,749Aamber8
- #7,749Abbigayle8
- #7,749Abigael8
Tied with 614 names at #7,134; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,841,515 boys got a published name in 1986; 1 in 87,691 of them was named Amando, which outranked 67.9% of the 7,830 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,429Ulisses22
- #2,429Wilford22
- #2,429Zain22
- #2,510Amando21
- #2,510Abe21
- #2,510Adison21
- #2,510Aleksander21
- #2,601Aditya20
- #2,601Akil20
- #2,601Andrei20
Tied with 90 names at #2,510; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.