Alonza
Last seen for girls in 2001 at #13,521 · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #12,330
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1886 · 15 births
- Debut · boys
- 10 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 3,315since 1880
Alonza over time
Rank among boys' names. Alonza has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | #12,330 | 5 | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | #12,108 | 5 | |
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | #8,985 | 8 | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | #8,173 | 9 | |
| 2006 | — | #12,055 | 5 | |
| 2005 | — | #9,115 | 7 | |
| 2004 | — | #9,948 | 6 | |
| 2003 | — | #10,894 | 5 | |
| 2002 | — | #10,667 | 5 | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | — | #5,920 | 11 | |
| 1999 | — | #6,042 | 10 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,650 | 14 | |
| 1997 | — | #7,281 | 7 | |
| 1996 | — | #5,535 | 10 | |
| 1995 | — | #5,501 | 10 | |
| 1994 | — | #6,372 | 8 | |
| 1993 | — | #3,661 | 17 | |
| 1992 | — | #5,236 | 10 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,005 | 14 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,166 | 19 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,325 | 17 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,599 | 22 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,838 | 18 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,360 | 23 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,116 | 26 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,956 | 15 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,787 | 16 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,831 | 16 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,204 | 23 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,619 | 36 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,568 | 18 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,913 | 26 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,202 | 21 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,932 | 25 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,704 | 29 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,692 | 28 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,514 | 32 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,364 | 38 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,862 | 23 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,351 | 38 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,265 | 39 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,428 | 30 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,287 | 34 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,259 | 36 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,206 | 40 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,189 | 42 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,081 | 50 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,056 | 52 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,001 | 60 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,229 | 41 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,050 | 54 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,186 | 42 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,100 | 48 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,171 | 42 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,002 | 56 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,045 | 51 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,139 | 42 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,111 | 43 | |
| 1951 | — | #915 | 59 | |
| 1950 | — | #926 | 55 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,144 | 38 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,023 | 47 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,136 | 41 | |
| 1946 | — | #980 | 47 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,270 | 27 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,070 | 38 | |
| 1943 | — | #1,155 | 35 | |
| 1942 | — | #1,036 | 42 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,209 | 30 | |
| 1940 | — | #1,208 | 31 | |
| 1939 | — | #976 | 42 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,171 | 31 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,180 | 31 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,205 | 30 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,194 | 31 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,133 | 34 | |
| 1933 | — | #946 | 44 | |
| 1932 | — | #963 | 46 | |
| 1931 | — | #1,333 | 27 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,037 | 44 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,026 | 44 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,125 | 39 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,322 | 31 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,050 | 44 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,108 | 40 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,169 | 38 | |
| 1923 | — | #976 | 50 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,222 | 35 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,086 | 42 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,045 | 44 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,122 | 38 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,035 | 42 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,264 | 29 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,043 | 38 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,100 | 34 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,127 | 26 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,049 | 23 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,137 | 17 | |
| 1911 | — | #896 | 14 | |
| 1910 | — | #677 | 19 | |
| 1909 | — | #804 | 13 | |
| 1908 | — | #744 | 13 | |
| 1907 | — | #778 | 12 | |
| 1906 | — | #709 | 12 | |
| 1905 | — | #786 | 10 | |
| 1904 | — | #966 | 7 | |
| 1903 | — | #783 | 9 | |
| 1902 | — | #933 | 7 | |
| 1901 | — | #596 | 12 | |
| 1900 | — | #1,162 | 6 | |
| 1899 | — | #857 | 7 | |
| 1898 | — | #701 | 10 | |
| 1897 | — | #725 | 9 | |
| 1896 | — | #722 | 10 | |
| 1895 | — | #872 | 7 | |
| 1894 | — | #668 | 10 | |
| 1893 | — | #479 | 15 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #841 | 6 | |
| 1890 | — | #994 | 5 | |
| 1889 | — | #673 | 9 | |
| 1888 | — | #609 | 11 | |
| 1887 | — | #583 | 10 | |
| 1886 | — | #470 | 15 | |
| 1885 | — | #700 | 8 | |
| 1884 | — | #764 | 7 | |
| 1883 | — | #644 | 9 | |
| 1882 | — | #611 | 10 | |
| 1881 | — | #563 | 10 | |
| 1880 | — | #600 | 10 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Alonza was already there! It came in at #600, and was given to 10 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2008, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Alonza
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2022
- Biggest jump: 566 spots in 1901 (#1,162 → #596)
- Biggest drop: 337 spots in 1902 (#596 → #933)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1886 at #470 (15 births)
- Births halved by 1890, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 38 yrs · run 1880–1899
- Highest: 1 in 7,386 boys born in 1886 were named Alonza (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 349,202 boys born in 2022 (0.00%)
- 14.8% of all boys named Alonza (492) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 99 | #470 (1886) | #622 |
| 1890s | 90 | #479 (1893) | #750 |
| 1900s | 101 | #596 (1901) | #826 |
| 1910s | 280 | #677 (1910) | #1,045 |
| 1920s | 407 | #976 (1923) | #1,113 |
| 1930s | 360 | #946 (1933) | #1,114 |
| 1940s | 376 | #980 (1946) | #1,123 |
| 1950s | 492 | #915 (1951) | #1,065 |
| 1960s | 424 | #1,001 (1961) | #1,200 |
| 1970s | 278 | #1,351 (1970) | #1,810 |
| 1980s | 212 | #1,619 (1980) | #2,564 |
| 1990s | 119 | #3,166 (1990) | #5,145 |
| 2000s | 67 | #5,920 (2000) | #9,086 |
| 2010s | 5 | #12,108 (2014) | #12,108 |
| 2020s | 5 | #12,330 (2022) | #12,330 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Alonza in 1915
Top boys' names in 1915
More about 1915
boys
848,575 boys got a published name in 1915; 1 in 24,958 of them was named Alonza, which outranked 74.9% of the 4,390 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,082Metro35
- #1,082Winton35
- #1,082Wright35
- #1,100Alonza34
- #1,100Alf34
- #1,100Bailey34
- #1,100Barry34
- #1,124Adrien33
- #1,124Anson33
- #1,124Arvin33
Tied with 23 names at #1,100; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.