Alecia
#5,554 for girls in 2025, 22 births
- Peak · girls
- 1987 · 362 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,055since 1917
Alecia over time
Rank among girls' names. Alecia has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,554 | 22 |
| 2024 | #7,967 | 13 |
| 2023 | #4,999 | 26 |
| 2022 | #6,707 | 17 |
| 2021 | #4,719 | 28 |
| 2020 | #5,850 | 20 |
| 2019 | #6,176 | 19 |
| 2018 | #3,739 | 40 |
| 2017 | #5,045 | 26 |
| 2016 | #3,923 | 38 |
| 2015 | #3,478 | 45 |
| 2014 | #3,425 | 46 |
| 2013 | #3,123 | 52 |
| 2012 | #2,516 | 72 |
| 2011 | #2,838 | 61 |
| 2010 | #2,202 | 88 |
| 2009 | #2,485 | 76 |
| 2008 | #1,717 | 129 |
| 2007 | #1,894 | 109 |
| 2006 | #1,905 | 106 |
| 2005 | #1,704 | 116 |
| 2004 | #1,684 | 115 |
| 2003 | #1,498 | 130 |
| 2002 | #1,328 | 146 |
| 2001 | #1,253 | 157 |
| 2000 | #1,188 | 168 |
| 1999 | #1,143 | 171 |
| 1998 | #1,069 | 182 |
| 1997 | #1,000 | 194 |
| 1996 | #865 | 229 |
| 1995 | #893 | 212 |
| 1994 | #877 | 223 |
| 1993 | #892 | 216 |
| 1992 | #753 | 278 |
| 1991 | #738 | 281 |
| 1990 | #682 | 313 |
| 1989 | #616 | 346 |
| 1988 | #667 | 289 |
| 1987 | #555 | 362 |
| 1986 | #572 | 340 |
| 1985 | #564 | 349 |
| 1984 | #560 | 331 |
| 1983 | #583 | 306 |
| 1982 | #668 | 266 |
| 1981 | #609 | 299 |
| 1980 | #601 | 308 |
| 1979 | #617 | 286 |
| 1978 | #601 | 284 |
| 1977 | #635 | 263 |
| 1976 | #684 | 216 |
| 1975 | #712 | 207 |
| 1974 | #749 | 189 |
| 1973 | #718 | 201 |
| 1972 | #760 | 183 |
| 1971 | #777 | 187 |
| 1970 | #731 | 202 |
| 1969 | #713 | 199 |
| 1968 | #712 | 187 |
| 1967 | #865 | 137 |
| 1966 | #774 | 161 |
| 1965 | #704 | 194 |
| 1964 | #764 | 185 |
| 1963 | #814 | 162 |
| 1962 | #916 | 133 |
| 1961 | #983 | 121 |
| 1960 | #1,025 | 110 |
| 1959 | #1,135 | 88 |
| 1958 | #1,196 | 79 |
| 1957 | #1,211 | 76 |
| 1956 | #1,480 | 51 |
| 1955 | #1,275 | 62 |
| 1954 | #1,256 | 62 |
| 1953 | #1,312 | 55 |
| 1952 | #1,236 | 59 |
| 1951 | #1,555 | 37 |
| 1950 | #1,452 | 40 |
| 1949 | #1,767 | 29 |
| 1948 | #2,070 | 22 |
| 1947 | #1,790 | 29 |
| 1946 | #2,024 | 21 |
| 1945 | #1,825 | 21 |
| 1944 | #2,287 | 15 |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 |
| 1942 | #3,738 | 7 |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 |
| 1939 | #2,736 | 10 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 |
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | #3,682 | 7 |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,564 | 8 |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | #3,971 | 7 |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | #4,975 | 5 |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Alecia! It came in at #4,083, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1918–1922, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Alecia is popular in 1982
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alabama#250 · 1 in 1,458
- Mississippi#345 · 1 in 1,998
- Oklahoma#357 · 1 in 2,257
- North Carolina#382 · 1 in 2,850
- Utah#397 · 1 in 2,733
Best ever in a state: #136 in North Dakota, 1983.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #250 | 15 | 1 in 1,458 |
| Mississippi | #345 | 8 | 1 in 1,998 |
| Oklahoma | #357 | 10 | 1 in 2,257 |
| North Carolina | #382 | 12 | 1 in 2,850 |
| Utah | #397 | 6 | 1 in 2,733 |
| Minnesota | #407 | 8 | 1 in 3,656 |
| South Carolina | #434 | 6 | 1 in 2,981 |
| Kentucky | #447 | 6 | 1 in 3,959 |
| Georgia | #448 | 11 | 1 in 3,171 |
| Wisconsin | #459 | 7 | 1 in 4,489 |
| Ohio | #497 | 15 | 1 in 4,765 |
| Missouri | #505 | 7 | 1 in 4,598 |
| Pennsylvania | #525 | 14 | 1 in 4,993 |
| Tennessee | #525 | 6 | 1 in 4,676 |
| Maryland | #545 | 5 | 1 in 4,457 |
| Michigan | #585 | 10 | 1 in 5,761 |
| Washington | #600 | 6 | 1 in 4,586 |
| Texas | #763 | 19 | 1 in 6,838 |
| New York | #764 | 15 | 1 in 6,850 |
| Florida | #780 | 8 | 1 in 7,088 |
| Illinois | #801 | 10 | 1 in 7,443 |
| California | #1,292 | 13 | 1 in 14,287 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alecia
- 2,413 spots since 2024 (#7,967 → #5,554)
- 296 spots since 2020 (#5,850 → #5,554)
- 2,076 spots since 2015 (#3,478 → #5,554)
- Biggest jump: 153 spots in 1968 (#865 → #712)
- Biggest drop: 139 spots in 1993 (#753 → #892)
- Debuted 1917
- Peaked 1987 at #555 (362 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 12 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 37 yrs · run 1961–1997
- Highest: 1 in 4,803 girls born in 1987 were named Alecia (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 73,058 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 26.5% of all girls named Alecia (3,196) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 6 | #4,083 (1917) | #4,083 |
| 1920s | 39 | #3,564 (1926) | #4,157 |
| 1930s | 57 | #2,736 (1939) | #3,526 |
| 1940s | 177 | #1,767 (1949) | #2,411 |
| 1950s | 609 | #1,135 (1959) | #1,311 |
| 1960s | 1,589 | #704 (1965) | #827 |
| 1970s | 2,218 | #601 (1978) | #698 |
| 1980s | 3,196 | #555 (1987) | #600 |
| 1990s | 2,299 | #682 (1990) | #891 |
| 2000s | 1,252 | #1,188 (2000) | #1,666 |
| 2010s | 487 | #2,202 (2010) | #3,647 |
| 2020s | 126 | #4,719 (2021) | #5,966 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Alecia in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 6,366 of them was named Alecia, which outranked 94.6% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.