Aggie
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · Last seen for boys in 1932 at #3,361
Given to girls 98.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1900 · 26 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,490since 1881
Aggie over time
Rank among girls' names. Aggie has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #8,486 | 12 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | — | |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | — | |
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | — | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,293 | 15 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,598 | 12 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,867 | 21 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,900 | 21 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,311 | 15 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,638 | 22 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,437 | 27 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,663 | 21 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,603 | 22 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,773 | 19 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 | #3,361 | 6 |
| 1931 | #1,941 | 17 | #3,763 | 5 |
| 1930 | #2,023 | 17 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,589 | 26 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,619 | 26 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,721 | 24 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,576 | 28 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,409 | 34 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,598 | 27 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,403 | 33 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #1,988 | 20 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,255 | 37 | #2,967 | 9 |
| 1919 | #1,348 | 33 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,470 | 26 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #1,298 | 31 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,367 | 27 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,228 | 25 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,151 | 23 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1909 | #845 | 23 | — | |
| 1908 | #939 | 18 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,206 | 11 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,057 | 13 | — | |
| 1904 | #880 | 17 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,137 | 10 | — | |
| 1902 | #972 | 13 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,067 | 10 | — | |
| 1900 | #705 | 26 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,009 | 12 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,053 | 10 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | — | |
| 1891 | #893 | 10 | — | |
| 1890 | #825 | 11 | — | |
| 1889 | #950 | 8 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 | — | |
| 1886 | #993 | 6 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #731 | 9 | — | |
| 1883 | #817 | 6 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Aggie! It came in at #830, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1882, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Aggie
- 5,396 spots since 2020 (#9,546 → #14,942)
- 1,936 spots since 2015 (#13,006 → #14,942)
- Biggest jump: 476 spots in 1900 (#1,181 → #705)
- Biggest drop: 362 spots in 1901 (#705 → #1,067)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1900 at #705 (26 births)
- Births halved by 1901, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 15 yrs · run 1883–1887
- Highest: 1 in 11,530 girls born in 1900 were named Aggie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 321,453 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 18.1% of all girls named Aggie (269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 58 | #731 (1884) | #874 |
| 1890s | 96 | #825 (1890) | #1,038 |
| 1900s | 148 | #705 (1900) | #1,036 |
| 1910s | 223 | #1,110 (1910) | #1,426 |
| 1920s | 269 | #1,255 (1920) | #1,646 |
| 1930s | 207 | #1,437 (1938) | #1,725 |
| 1940s | 150 | #1,867 (1944) | #2,470 |
| 1950s | 116 | #2,812 (1953) | #3,559 |
| 1960s | 87 | #3,293 (1962) | #4,646 |
| 1970s | 39 | #6,080 (1973) | #7,759 |
| 1980s | 16 | #7,398 (1984) | #8,080 |
| 1990s | 5 | #13,430 (1994) | #13,430 |
| 2000s | 18 | #13,704 (2009) | #15,582 |
| 2010s | 26 | #11,356 (2019) | #13,810 |
| 2020s | 32 | #8,486 (2023) | #12,056 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Aggie in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 66,697 of them was named Aggie, which outranked 60.0% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,957Wilhelmena17
- #1,957Wyona17
- #1,957Zelpha17
- #2,037Aggie16
- #2,037Aimee16
- #2,037Alvie16
- #2,037America16
- #2,130Afton15
- #2,130Aleene15
- #2,130Alethia15
Tied with 92 names at #2,037; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 174,026 of them was named Aggie, which outranked 21.5% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,092Yasuo7
- #3,092Yates7
- #3,092Ysabel7
- #3,361Aggie6
- #3,361Able6
- #3,361Acencion6
- #3,361Achille6
- #3,776Abdon5
- #3,776Adel5
- #3,776Adelino5
Tied with 414 names at #3,361; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.