Aggie
#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · Last seen for boys in 1932 at #3,361
Given to girls 98.0% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1900 · 26 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,490since 1881
Aggie over time
Rank among girls' names. Aggie has never cracked the top 700 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #8,486 | 12 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | — | |
| 2020 | #9,546 | 10 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | #14,331 | 6 | — | |
| 2015 | #13,006 | 7 | — | |
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #13,704 | 7 | — | |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #13,430 | 5 | — | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #6,080 | 8 | — | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 | — | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | #4,202 | 10 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,096 | 11 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,293 | 15 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | — | |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,254 | 14 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 | — | |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,228 | 18 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,598 | 12 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,867 | 21 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,900 | 21 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,311 | 15 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,397 | 13 | — | |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,638 | 22 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,437 | 27 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,493 | 25 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,640 | 21 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,663 | 21 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,603 | 22 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,773 | 19 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,037 | 16 | #3,361 | 6 |
| 1931 | #1,941 | 17 | #3,763 | 5 |
| 1930 | #2,023 | 17 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,589 | 26 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,619 | 26 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,721 | 24 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,576 | 28 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,409 | 34 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,598 | 27 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,403 | 33 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #1,988 | 20 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,255 | 37 | #2,967 | 9 |
| 1919 | #1,348 | 33 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,690 | 23 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,470 | 26 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #1,298 | 31 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,367 | 27 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,228 | 25 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,151 | 23 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,450 | 11 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1909 | #845 | 23 | — | |
| 1908 | #939 | 18 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,206 | 11 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,057 | 13 | — | |
| 1904 | #880 | 17 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,137 | 10 | — | |
| 1902 | #972 | 13 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,067 | 10 | — | |
| 1900 | #705 | 26 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,009 | 12 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,037 | 10 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,053 | 10 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,171 | 7 | — | |
| 1891 | #893 | 10 | — | |
| 1890 | #825 | 11 | — | |
| 1889 | #950 | 8 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | #788 | 9 | — | |
| 1886 | #993 | 6 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #731 | 9 | — | |
| 1883 | #817 | 6 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Aggie! It came in at #830, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1882, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Aggie
- 5,396 spots since 2020 (#9,546 → #14,942)
- 1,936 spots since 2015 (#13,006 → #14,942)
- Biggest jump: 476 spots in 1900 (#1,181 → #705)
- Biggest drop: 362 spots in 1901 (#705 → #1,067)
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1900 at #705 (26 births)
- Births halved by 1901, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 15 yrs · run 1883–1887
- Highest: 1 in 11,530 girls born in 1900 were named Aggie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 321,453 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 18.1% of all girls named Aggie (269) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 58 | #731 (1884) | #874 |
| 1890s | 96 | #825 (1890) | #1,038 |
| 1900s | 148 | #705 (1900) | #1,036 |
| 1910s | 223 | #1,110 (1910) | #1,426 |
| 1920s | 269 | #1,255 (1920) | #1,646 |
| 1930s | 207 | #1,437 (1938) | #1,725 |
| 1940s | 150 | #1,867 (1944) | #2,470 |
| 1950s | 116 | #2,812 (1953) | #3,559 |
| 1960s | 87 | #3,293 (1962) | #4,646 |
| 1970s | 39 | #6,080 (1973) | #7,759 |
| 1980s | 16 | #7,398 (1984) | #8,080 |
| 1990s | 5 | #13,430 (1994) | #13,430 |
| 2000s | 18 | #13,704 (2009) | #15,582 |
| 2010s | 26 | #11,356 (2019) | #13,810 |
| 2020s | 32 | #8,486 (2023) | #12,056 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Aggie in 1925
Top girls' names in 1925
More about 1925
girls
1,217,384 girls got a published name in 1925; 1 in 43,478 of them was named Aggie, which outranked 72.7% of the 5,771 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,535Vernia29
- #1,535Willard29
- #1,535Yola29
- #1,576Aggie28
- #1,576Adline28
- #1,576Alean28
- #1,576Alverda28
- #1,609Annamay27
- #1,609Arizona27
- #1,609Arliss27
Tied with 32 names at #1,576; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.