Abigail
#41 for girls in 2025, 4,941 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #8,255
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 15,756 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 37 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 413,263since 1880
Abigail over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #41 | 4,941 | — | |
| 2024 | #32 | 5,535 | — | |
| 2023 | #31 | 5,687 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #24 | 6,306 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #17 | 6,993 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #12 | 7,917 | — | |
| 2019 | #11 | 9,196 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #11 | 9,879 | #6,345 | 13 |
| 2017 | #10 | 10,645 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #8 | 11,796 | #7,605 | 10 |
| 2015 | #7 | 12,422 | #7,491 | 10 |
| 2014 | #8 | 12,114 | #6,307 | 13 |
| 2013 | #8 | 12,429 | #5,404 | 16 |
| 2012 | #7 | 12,730 | #6,306 | 13 |
| 2011 | #7 | 13,266 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #7 | 14,257 | #8,139 | 9 |
| 2009 | #8 | 14,401 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #8 | 15,088 | #4,714 | 20 |
| 2007 | #8 | 15,476 | #3,793 | 27 |
| 2006 | #6 | 15,633 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #4 | 15,756 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #6 | 15,436 | #1,502 | 89 |
| 2003 | #6 | 15,932 | #3,732 | 23 |
| 2002 | #7 | 15,303 | #4,044 | 20 |
| 2001 | #8 | 14,807 | #4,121 | 19 |
| 2000 | #14 | 13,094 | #4,573 | 16 |
| 1999 | #18 | 11,686 | #4,162 | 17 |
| 1998 | #18 | 11,100 | #3,390 | 22 |
| 1997 | #26 | 9,630 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #32 | 8,604 | #3,830 | 17 |
| 1995 | #36 | 7,825 | #4,791 | 12 |
| 1994 | #42 | 7,243 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #67 | 5,185 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #86 | 3,988 | #3,748 | 16 |
| 1991 | #92 | 3,799 | #4,231 | 13 |
| 1990 | #90 | 3,719 | #3,058 | 20 |
| 1989 | #94 | 3,405 | #2,784 | 22 |
| 1988 | #118 | 2,376 | #4,450 | 10 |
| 1987 | #138 | 2,001 | #3,521 | 13 |
| 1986 | #143 | 1,996 | #3,131 | 15 |
| 1985 | #153 | 1,848 | #3,599 | 12 |
| 1984 | #154 | 1,844 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #151 | 1,909 | #3,411 | 12 |
| 1982 | #157 | 1,886 | #4,593 | 8 |
| 1981 | #156 | 1,816 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #176 | 1,577 | #3,615 | 11 |
| 1979 | #213 | 1,226 | — | |
| 1978 | #242 | 1,010 | — | |
| 1977 | #298 | 794 | — | |
| 1976 | #278 | 827 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #353 | 615 | — | |
| 1974 | #357 | 606 | — | |
| 1973 | #413 | 479 | — | |
| 1972 | #468 | 393 | — | |
| 1971 | #491 | 392 | — | |
| 1970 | #526 | 362 | — | |
| 1969 | #590 | 281 | — | |
| 1968 | #592 | 263 | — | |
| 1967 | #609 | 244 | — | |
| 1966 | #710 | 191 | — | |
| 1965 | #679 | 209 | — | |
| 1964 | #655 | 244 | — | |
| 1963 | #633 | 255 | — | |
| 1962 | #617 | 264 | — | |
| 1961 | #680 | 232 | — | |
| 1960 | #673 | 228 | — | |
| 1959 | #698 | 206 | — | |
| 1958 | #712 | 192 | — | |
| 1957 | #731 | 187 | — | |
| 1956 | #694 | 190 | — | |
| 1955 | #700 | 180 | — | |
| 1954 | #773 | 147 | — | |
| 1953 | #705 | 169 | — | |
| 1952 | #723 | 151 | — | |
| 1951 | #749 | 137 | — | |
| 1950 | #824 | 112 | — | |
| 1949 | #823 | 113 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,041 | 72 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,003 | 78 | — | |
| 1946 | #953 | 76 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,080 | 53 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,046 | 56 | — | |
| 1943 | #996 | 63 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,137 | 48 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,184 | 40 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,035 | 48 | — | |
| 1939 | #974 | 53 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,007 | 50 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,063 | 45 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,186 | 36 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,162 | 37 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,317 | 30 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,262 | 32 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,346 | 30 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,421 | 27 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,569 | 25 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,306 | 33 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,210 | 40 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,404 | 33 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,483 | 30 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,296 | 37 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,503 | 31 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,536 | 29 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,765 | 24 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,375 | 33 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,393 | 31 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,566 | 26 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,110 | 41 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,167 | 37 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,094 | 38 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,228 | 25 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,601 | 14 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,055 | 24 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,031 | 18 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,219 | 12 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,135 | 13 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | — | |
| 1906 | #965 | 15 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,162 | 11 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | #760 | 20 | — | |
| 1902 | #818 | 18 | — | |
| 1901 | #918 | 13 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,008 | 14 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,047 | 11 | — | |
| 1897 | #826 | 15 | — | |
| 1896 | #843 | 15 | — | |
| 1895 | #815 | 15 | — | |
| 1894 | #850 | 13 | — | |
| 1893 | #630 | 21 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 | — | |
| 1890 | #940 | 9 | — | |
| 1889 | #567 | 20 | — | |
| 1888 | #593 | 18 | — | |
| 1887 | #633 | 13 | — | |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #579 | 11 | — | |
| 1882 | #493 | 14 | — | |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | — | |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Abigail was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Abigail is popular in 1992
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#35 · 1 in 143
- New Hampshire#37 · 1 in 139
- Vermont#40 · 1 in 125
- Wisconsin#51 · 1 in 223
- Iowa#52 · 1 in 209
Best ever in a state: #2 in Maine, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #35 | 40 | 1 in 143 |
| New Hampshire | #37 | 42 | 1 in 139 |
| Vermont | #40 | 19 | 1 in 125 |
| Wisconsin | #51 | 124 | 1 in 223 |
| Indiana | #52 | 155 | 1 in 214 |
| Iowa | #52 | 73 | 1 in 209 |
| Ohio | #58 | 275 | 1 in 247 |
| Nebraska | #59 | 35 | 1 in 243 |
| Missouri | #60 | 119 | 1 in 260 |
| Kansas | #62 | 52 | 1 in 256 |
| Illinois | #63 | 259 | 1 in 291 |
| Minnesota | #66 | 101 | 1 in 261 |
| Massachusetts | #67 | 130 | 1 in 276 |
| Connecticut | #69 | 68 | 1 in 263 |
| Montana | #70 | 14 | 1 in 240 |
| Texas | #75 | 393 | 1 in 350 |
| Michigan | #76 | 164 | 1 in 348 |
| Pennsylvania | #81 | 183 | 1 in 374 |
| Oregon | #87 | 45 | 1 in 361 |
| Washington | #90 | 77 | 1 in 400 |
| Tennessee | #91 | 68 | 1 in 437 |
| Utah | #92 | 39 | 1 in 354 |
| Georgia | #93 | 90 | 1 in 459 |
| District of Columbia | #95 | 15 | 1 in 351 |
| South Dakota | #96 | 11 | 1 in 334 |
| Maryland | #98 | 60 | 1 in 448 |
| Delaware | #99 | 9 | 1 in 396 |
| Kentucky | #99 | 51 | 1 in 411 |
| South Carolina | #99 | 41 | 1 in 461 |
| Virginia | #101 | 78 | 1 in 468 |
| Colorado | #107 | 46 | 1 in 459 |
| Arkansas | #108 | 26 | 1 in 456 |
| Hawaii | #109 | 12 | 1 in 400 |
| Idaho | #110 | 14 | 1 in 389 |
| Rhode Island | #110 | 12 | 1 in 436 |
| New Jersey | #112 | 88 | 1 in 518 |
| Arizona | #114 | 49 | 1 in 534 |
| New York | #114 | 209 | 1 in 556 |
| North Dakota | #115 | 8 | 1 in 416 |
| Oklahoma | #118 | 33 | 1 in 521 |
| North Carolina | #119 | 66 | 1 in 604 |
| West Virginia | #120 | 16 | 1 in 523 |
| Alabama | #133 | 34 | 1 in 629 |
| Florida | #134 | 105 | 1 in 715 |
| New Mexico | #140 | 16 | 1 in 579 |
| California | #143 | 363 | 1 in 707 |
| Louisiana | #148 | 32 | 1 in 741 |
| Alaska | #160 | 6 | 1 in 540 |
| Mississippi | #190 | 14 | 1 in 920 |
| Nevada | #214 | 8 | 1 in 909 |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Abigail
- 9 spots since 2024 (#32 → #41)
- 29 spots since 2020 (#12 → #41)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#7 → #41)
- Biggest jump: 278 spots in 1893 (#908 → #630)
- Biggest drop: 604 spots in 1904 (#760 → #1,364)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2005 at #4 (15,756 births)
- Births halved by 2021, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: 17 yrs · run 2001–2017
- Top 100: 37 yrs · run 1989–2025
- Top 1,000: 102 yrs · run 1949–2025
- Highest: 1 in 115 girls born in 2003 were named Abigail (0.87%)
- Latest: 1 in 325 girls born in 2025 (0.31%)
- Its best rank, #4 in 2005, was only 1 in 117 (0.85%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 36.5% of all girls named Abigail (150,926) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 133 | #492 (1880) | #588 |
| 1890s | 128 | #630 (1893) | #898 |
| 1900s | 136 | #760 (1903) | #1,049 |
| 1910s | 270 | #1,031 (1911) | #1,236 |
| 1920s | 322 | #1,210 (1928) | #1,431 |
| 1930s | 365 | #974 (1939) | #1,231 |
| 1940s | 647 | #823 (1949) | #1,030 |
| 1950s | 1,671 | #694 (1956) | #731 |
| 1960s | 2,411 | #590 (1969) | #644 |
| 1970s | 6,704 | #213 (1979) | #364 |
| 1980s | 20,658 | #94 (1989) | #144 |
| 1990s | 72,779 | #18 (1999) | #51 |
| 2000s | 150,926 | #4 (2005) | #8 |
| 2010s | 118,734 | #7 (2010) | #8 |
| 2020s | 37,379 | #12 (2020) | #26 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Abigail in 1992
Top girls' names in 1992
Top boys' names in 1992
More about 1992
girls
1,843,931 girls got a published name in 1992; 1 in 462 of them was named Abigail, which outranked 99.4% of the 15,610 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 13.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,997,409 boys got a published name in 1992; 1 in 124,838 of them was named Abigail, which outranked 61.8% of the 9,820 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #3,604Zacchary17
- #3,604Zachrey17
- #3,604Zeb17
- #3,748Abigail16
- #3,748Adams16
- #3,748Ahron16
- #3,748Alban16
- #3,920Adham15
- #3,920Adolphus15
- #3,920Ahkeem15
Tied with 171 names at #3,748; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.