Abbey
#5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #9,948
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1999 · 710 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 17,509since 1917
Abbey over time
Rank among girls' names. Abbey has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | — | |
| 2024 | #5,615 | 22 | — | |
| 2023 | #6,169 | 19 | — | |
| 2022 | #4,041 | 36 | — | |
| 2021 | #3,435 | 45 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,341 | 75 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,249 | 81 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,647 | 65 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,053 | 95 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,590 | 139 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,416 | 163 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,446 | 157 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,101 | 222 | — | |
| 2012 | #999 | 253 | — | |
| 2011 | #898 | 290 | — | |
| 2010 | #886 | 299 | — | |
| 2009 | #893 | 307 | — | |
| 2008 | #825 | 344 | — | |
| 2007 | #822 | 349 | — | |
| 2006 | #703 | 404 | — | |
| 2005 | #621 | 453 | — | |
| 2004 | #567 | 505 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #474 | 625 | — | |
| 2002 | #472 | 600 | — | |
| 2001 | #416 | 688 | — | |
| 2000 | #425 | 660 | — | |
| 1999 | #392 | 710 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #408 | 662 | — | |
| 1997 | #406 | 646 | — | |
| 1996 | #454 | 552 | — | |
| 1995 | #460 | 549 | — | |
| 1994 | #420 | 597 | — | |
| 1993 | #496 | 503 | — | |
| 1992 | #545 | 430 | — | |
| 1991 | #515 | 451 | — | |
| 1990 | #481 | 508 | — | |
| 1989 | #500 | 470 | — | |
| 1988 | #539 | 404 | — | |
| 1987 | #597 | 327 | — | |
| 1986 | #548 | 370 | — | |
| 1985 | #603 | 314 | — | |
| 1984 | #538 | 357 | — | |
| 1983 | #475 | 420 | — | |
| 1982 | #529 | 370 | — | |
| 1981 | #514 | 383 | — | |
| 1980 | #659 | 273 | — | |
| 1979 | #675 | 255 | — | |
| 1978 | #842 | 176 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,380 | 81 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,694 | 57 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,625 | 60 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,553 | 62 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,622 | 56 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,276 | 33 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,857 | 47 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,307 | 33 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,296 | 31 | — | |
| 1968 | #3,315 | 16 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,963 | 18 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,839 | 19 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,833 | 19 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,515 | 14 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,033 | 17 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,752 | 20 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,729 | 20 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,458 | 22 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,755 | 18 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,416 | 22 | — | |
| 1956 | #3,696 | 11 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,222 | 24 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,325 | 12 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 | — | |
| 1952 | #2,806 | 15 | — | |
| 1951 | #2,577 | 16 | #3,066 | 7 |
| 1950 | #4,315 | 7 | — | |
| 1949 | #3,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,883 | 8 | — | |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | #3,173 | 6 |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | — | |
| 1944 | #3,378 | 8 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1942 | #3,194 | 9 | — | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 | — | |
| 1938 | #4,342 | 5 | — | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | #5,099 | 5 | — | |
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | #3,344 | 8 | — | |
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | #3,264 | 5 | |
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Abbey! It came in at #3,344, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1918–1938, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Abbey is popular in 1982
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#210 · 1 in 1,176
- Nebraska#240 · 1 in 1,345
- Indiana#246 · 1 in 1,599
- Minnesota#261 · 1 in 1,828
- Ohio#265 · 1 in 1,833
Best ever in a state: #91 in North Dakota, 2000.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #210 | 16 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Nebraska | #240 | 8 | 1 in 1,345 |
| Indiana | #246 | 22 | 1 in 1,599 |
| Minnesota | #261 | 16 | 1 in 1,828 |
| Ohio | #265 | 39 | 1 in 1,833 |
| Wisconsin | #301 | 14 | 1 in 2,244 |
| Pennsylvania | #328 | 29 | 1 in 2,410 |
| Kansas | #343 | 7 | 1 in 2,217 |
| Colorado | #349 | 10 | 1 in 2,205 |
| Missouri | #376 | 11 | 1 in 2,926 |
| Michigan | #382 | 19 | 1 in 3,032 |
| Oklahoma | #420 | 8 | 1 in 2,822 |
| Illinois | #431 | 24 | 1 in 3,101 |
| Massachusetts | #461 | 8 | 1 in 4,071 |
| Virginia | #518 | 7 | 1 in 4,400 |
| Maryland | #545 | 5 | 1 in 4,457 |
| North Carolina | #630 | 6 | 1 in 5,700 |
| Louisiana | #683 | 6 | 1 in 5,280 |
| Texas | #747 | 20 | 1 in 6,496 |
| Georgia | #772 | 5 | 1 in 6,975 |
| New York | #810 | 14 | 1 in 7,339 |
| Florida | #966 | 6 | 1 in 9,451 |
| California | #1,214 | 14 | 1 in 13,267 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Abbey
- 107 spots since 2024 (#5,615 → #5,722)
- 3,381 spots since 2020 (#2,341 → #5,722)
- 4,306 spots since 2015 (#1,416 → #5,722)
- Biggest jump: 538 spots in 1978 (#1,380 → #842)
- Biggest drop: 119 spots in 2007 (#703 → #822)
- Debuted 1917
- Peaked 1999 at #392 (710 births)
- Births halved by 2007, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 35 yrs · run 1978–2012
- Highest: 1 in 2,498 girls born in 1999 were named Abbey (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 76,537 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 32.0% of all girls named Abbey (5,608) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 8 | #3,344 (1917) | #3,344 |
| 1920s | 5 | #5,099 (1921) | #5,099 |
| 1930s | 17 | #3,429 (1939) | #4,061 |
| 1940s | 60 | #3,194 (1942) | #3,853 |
| 1950s | 158 | #2,222 (1955) | #3,005 |
| 1960s | 188 | #2,296 (1969) | #2,973 |
| 1970s | 860 | #675 (1979) | #1,583 |
| 1980s | 3,688 | #475 (1983) | #550 |
| 1990s | 5,608 | #392 (1999) | #458 |
| 2000s | 4,935 | #416 (2001) | #622 |
| 2010s | 1,764 | #886 (2010) | #1,529 |
| 2020s | 218 | #2,341 (2020) | #4,554 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Abbey in 1982
Top girls' names in 1982
More about 1982
girls
1,693,325 girls got a published name in 1982; 1 in 4,577 of them was named Abbey, which outranked 95.7% of the 12,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).